Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
R>R Personal answerDepends on the way they got impregnated, rape victims and incest are some examples, but if its for something like "I don't like my boyfriend, so I'm going to take away his baby" then no. |
Healthcare › Mental Health
R>R Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
R>R Personal answerNo |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
R>R Personal answerYes |
Social › Gay Marriage
R>R Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Identity
R>R Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Taxes
R>R Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
R>R Personal answerNo |
Social › Hate Speech
R>R Personal answerNo |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
R>R Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
R>R Personal answerNo |
Social › Euthanasia
R>R Personal answerWhile it is inhumane, it is more inhumane to let someone suffer in the hellish abyss that is terminal mental illness, if there is a chance they can be saved, then we should try for a certain amount of time, the amount of time depends on the illness, but if it's impossible, then don't let them suffer. |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
R>R Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
R>R Personal answerYes, but the test should be where you teach them basic English, make sure they know their rights, morals, and what common sense in America is. |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
R>R Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
R>R Personal answerYes, until they have enough to live for a few months and are able to get a stable income job. |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
R>R Personal answerYes, as long as it is safe for them to return to their country |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
R>R Personal answerRaise |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
R>R Personal answerNo |
Social › Death Penalty
R>R Personal answerNo |
Social › Transgender Athletes
R>R Personal answerYes |
Social › Niqāb
R>R Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Social Media Regulation
R>R Personal answerYes |
Crime › Private Prisons
R>R Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
R>R Personal answerNo, not until we fix airport, and border security and checks |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
R>R Personal answerNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Elections
R>R Personal answerNo |
Social › Women in Combat
R>R Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
R>R Personal answerYes |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
R>R Personal answerDepending on how big their hustle was, and if people died and how many if people did die. |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
R>R Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
R>R Personal answerYes but slowly rehabilitate them at the same time to reduce overall usage. |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
R>R Personal answerNo |
Elections › Campaign Finance
R>R Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
R>R Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
R>R Personal answerIncrease |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
R>R Personal answerOnly if they have been given treatment and are checked for drugs 2 times every month for the next 2 years. |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
R>R Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Fracking
R>R Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Animal Testing
R>R Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
Healthcare › Marijuana
R>R Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Whistleblower Protection
R>R Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Labor Unions
R>R Personal answerIt depends on what they're doing to combat their reason for the Union. |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
R>R Personal answerYes |
Elections › Campaign Finance
R>R Personal answerYes, but limit the amount they can donate |
Foreign Policy › Israel Boycott
R>R Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
R>R Personal answerYes, but only depending on how many people are in the household, and the current rate should be reduced. |
Crime › Defunding the Police
R>R Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
the Economy › Welfare
R>R Personal answerMore, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
R>R Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Government Spending
R>R Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Domestic Jobs
R>R Personal answerYes, and drastically increase taxes and import tariffs on outsourcing businesses |
Science › Nuclear Energy
R>R Personal answerYes |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
R>R Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
R>R Personal answerDecrease |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
R>R Personal answerNo, but anyone who does it needs to accept Americans will be Americans, if they are in a neighbor where "Karens" and "Daves" are then those people will probably have some problems with them. If those people do get violent, then they have the right to defend themselves and call the police no questions asked, but they have understand the consequences. |
Transportation › Public Transportation
R>R Personal answerYes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions |
Immigration › Dual Citizenship
R>R Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
R>R Personal answerDecrease |
the Economy › NAFTA
R>R Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
R>R Personal answerYes |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
R>R Personal answerYes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
R>R Personal answerYes, as long as offshore income is reported |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
R>R Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Government Pensions
R>R Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
R>R Personal answerYes |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
R>R Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Bitcoin
R>R Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Tariffs
R>R Personal answerYes |
the Economy › State Ownership
R>R Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
R>R Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Sanctuary Cities
R>R Personal answerYes |
Education › Charter Schools
R>R Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
R>R Personal answerYes |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
▲ 5.9k118 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…2wks2W
▲ 469 replies
@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y
▲ 7710 replies2 agree6 disagree
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.