Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Healthcare › COVID Mask Mandate
E>E Personal answerYes |
Social › Abortion
E>E Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
E>E Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Mental Health
E>E Personal answerYes |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
E>E Personal answerYes |
Social › Gay Marriage
E>E Personal answerYes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies |
Social › Gender Identity
E>E Personal answerYes, and the government should do more to protect minorities from discrimination |
the Economy › Taxes
E>E Personal answer1) Eliminate citizen income tax, and restructure corporate earnings tax to a lower linear incrementing tax.(i.e. Set a bottom threshold of $10M annual gross profit at 2%, $50M at 3%, $100 at 4%... and cap at $100B at %15). With no loopholes, and assessed to any company that does business in the US, regardless of where the corporate HQ are and where products/services are generated, to avoid "Off shore" parent company strategy. 2) Simplify, but increase property tax for all entitles, civilian, local business, and corporations. This tax would also scale linearly. 3) Eliminate local and state sales tax and institute a national Value Added Tax dispersed between local, state, and federal proportionally |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
E>E Personal answerYes, and it should be at least two years of service |
Social › Hate Speech
E>E Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
E>E Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
E>E Personal answerNo, this will only cause prices to increase in a never ending cycle |
Social › Euthanasia
E>E Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
E>E Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
E>E Personal answerYes, but it should only cover very basic and simple topics |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
E>E Personal answerNo, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
E>E Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
E>E Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
E>E Personal answer1) Eliminate citizen income tax, and restructure corporate earnings tax to a lower linear incrementing tax.(i.e. Set a bottom threshold of $10M annual gross profit at 2%, $50M at 3%, $100 at 4%... and cap at $100B at %15). With no loopholes, and assessed to any company that does business in the US, regardless of where the corporate HQ are and where products/services are generated, to avoid "Off shore" parent company strategy. 2) Simplify, but increase property tax for all entitles, civilian, local business, and corporations. This tax would also scale linearly. 3) Eliminate local and state sales tax and institute a national Value Added Tax dispersed between local, state, and federal proportionally |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
E>E Personal answerYes |
Social › Death Penalty
E>E Personal answerYes |
Social › Transgender Athletes
E>E Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
Social › Niqāb
E>E Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Social Media Regulation
E>E Personal answerNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news |
Crime › Private Prisons
E>E Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
E>E Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
E>E Personal answerI don’t know |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Elections
E>E Personal answerNo |
Social › Women in Combat
E>E Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
E>E Personal answerYes |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
E>E Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
E>E Personal answerYes, for most but not all drugs |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
E>E Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
E>E Personal answerNo, we should be investing in making treatment/rehab more accessible and affordable for those who are lower income. Education programs and job programs too. We need to focus our efforts on truly helping those with addiction. NOT enabling and NOT imprisonment. |
Elections › Campaign Finance
E>E Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
E>E Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
E>E Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
E>E Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
E>E Personal answerYes, and ban all disposable products that are not made of at least 75% of biodegradable material |
the Environment › Fracking
E>E Personal answerNo, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead |
the Environment › Animal Testing
E>E Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
Domestic Policy › Whistleblower Protection
E>E Personal answerYes, but only if the information was legally obtained |
Healthcare › Marijuana
E>E Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Labor Unions
E>E Personal answerHelp, in theory but have recently become corrupt and should have their powers limited |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
E>E Personal answerNo |
Elections › Campaign Finance
E>E Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Israel Boycott
E>E Personal answerYes, boycotts against Israel harm one of our most important allies in the Middle East |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
E>E Personal answerYes, direct assistance and possible tax breaks for low to lower middle income households. Direct and tax breaks for small business only. Large companies and global corporations have the capital and should have the foresight to save and have their own safety net. The federal government need to adopt a hard policy of not providing fiscal support to large corporations, so it clear that those entities have to have their own contingency plan. |
Crime › Defunding the Police
E>E Personal answerThis is not an easy answer, but here goes. Law enforcement should have nationally standardized basic education requirements which states can expound on but not reduce. This education should cover and emphasize de-escalation, comprehensive basic sociology(including racial and gender equality), psychology, abnormal psychology, crisis/conflict resolution, basic medical/first aid, as well as the current tactical training they already receive. In whole academies should be much longer than the 9 week national average. Make a national certification test for academy graduates must pass before entering full time service. Mandate psychological evaluation and background checks before allowing entry into academies. Periodic psychological check ups and mandated independent counseling after high intensity events or when complaint investigations determine that the officer is operating outside of department guidelines. Limit unions abilities to shield officers that repeatedly violate policy and have zero tolerance policies for class B misdemeanor offences and higher. And cannot allow departments to rehire officers with out some sort of reconciliation or rehabilitation. We as a society expect a lot from local law enforcement. We either need to give them the tools they need to do all the things we think they should do, as an attempt to limit the risk of bodily damage or death to themselves and civilians. Or we limit the scope of what they do and employ other types of officers that handle non violent, non criminal activity. Communities need to get together with city and state officials at like an ongoing round-table to communicate the communities needs and concerns; then adjust action plans to best meet them. |
the Economy › Welfare
E>E Personal answerMore, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
E>E Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Spending
E>E Personal answerYes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional |
Science › Nuclear Energy
E>E Personal answerYes, and nationalize the industry |
the Economy › Domestic Jobs
E>E Personal answerYes |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
E>E Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
E>E Personal answerDecrease |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
E>E Personal answerNo |
Transportation › Public Transportation
E>E Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Dual Citizenship
E>E Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
E>E Personal answerIncrease |
the Economy › NAFTA
E>E Personal answerYes, but renegotiate NAFTA to be more fair |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
E>E Personal answerYes |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
E>E Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
E>E Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
E>E Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Pensions
E>E Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
E>E Personal answerYes |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
E>E Personal answerYes, but place them under house arrest using an electronic bracelet |
the Economy › Bitcoin
E>E Personal answerYes, but it should not replace our national treasury-backed currency |
the Economy › Tariffs
E>E Personal answerYes, this will help create and save more jobs |
the Economy › State Ownership
E>E Personal answerYes, under the stipulation that the bailed out company re-acquire that equity within a given time or the company is wholly sold to the highest bidder to buy out the government stake. This program should administered by an independent entity which would be audited by congress |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
E>E Personal answerN/A (I do not know what TTP is.) |
Immigration › Sanctuary Cities
E>E Personal answerNo, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities |
Education › Charter Schools
E>E Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
E>E Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
▲ 5.9k118 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…2wks2W
▲ 469 replies
@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y
▲ 7710 replies2 agree6 disagree
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.