@NotShaggy3

N>N  Personal answerNo, we should let the virus naturally run its course

N>N  Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

N>N  Personal answerYes, schools should require at least one teacher or security guard to be armed

N>N  Personal answerNo, give tax deductions to private companies that support/provide mental health research and treatment.

N>N  Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks, but individual adoption agencies (especially religious adoption agencies) should not be forced to violate their beliefs.

N>N  Personal answerTake the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision

N>N  Personal answerI'd have to with "Yes" here. I feel we need new language to describe this... technically, gender IS biologically decided. However, I feel strongly that a person should be free to live life as they want to, and should not be force to adhere to artificial "Gender Roles" or gender rules.

N>N  Personal answerNo, but everyone should register for selective service.

N>N  Personal answerAbolish the income tax, disallow all deductions and increase the sales tax

N>N  Personal answerThe government should not be involved AND the decisions for who should become a board member should be based on talent, qualifications, experience, etc. and not gender

N>N  Personal answerYes, but do not deport them if they fail, they can still remain Legal Residents until they pass the Civics test. And we should have mandatory Civic classrooms in all public schools.

N>N  Personal answerYes, but only if they go through a psychological examination to show they fully understand the choice.

N>N  Personal answerNo, only if they have entered the country illegally

N>N  Personal answerYes, but I would prefer to switch to a healthcare system that allows both single payer healthcare and free market healthcare, similar to countries like Australia.

N>N  Personal answerNo, minimum wage standards should be set by individual states and communities

N>N  Personal answerNo but we should encourage it because that's what our most prominent language spoken in the US is

N>N  Personal answerYes, only if they get rid of all of the current welfare system we have in place now.

N>N  Personal answerRequire the background checks, psychological testing, training, but also pass a national "stand your ground" and conceal carry laws with less restrictions. If they already passed these tests, location restrictions don't make sense especially since they are usually high value targets.

N>N  Personal answerLower, but focus first on lowering the tax rates for small businesses as top priority so competition and economic opportunity can thrive.

N>N  Personal answerThis should not be a political question because it is outside the domain of government. Let sporting organizations decide this question for themselves.

N>N  Personal answerYes, rapists and murderers with undeniable evidence to their crime should be killed.

N>N  Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

N>N  Personal answerYes, any person should be able to choose what to wear in public in their free time, plus almost everyone in America respects the dress codes of civic ceremonies

N>N  Personal answerI do not know enough about this topic to have an opinion.

N>N  Personal answerYes, but we should also get rid of laws that create monopolies, that ISP's have on the market.

N>N  Personal answerYes, but for harder positions ( more physically taxing etc) they should be required to pass the same physical tests as men

N>N  Personal answerYes but demand equal payment from all members

N>N  Personal answerYes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence, as long as the crime was not committed while in office, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime, and as long as they are not under investigation of a crime,

N>N  Personal answerNo, unless he/she has also committed violent crimes such as attempted murder, or first degree murder, or in any other way seriously injures someone as a result of doing a deal.

N>N  Personal answerYes, and retroactively reduce sentences for those already serving time

N>N  Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion

N>N  Personal answerNo, but drug addiction shouldn't be criminalized. It's a health issue.

N>N  Personal answerYes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians, also terminate benefits for anyone testing positive. "positive for certain class of drugs"

N>N  Personal answerYes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

N>N  Personal answerNo, instead use voluntary humans for testing

N>N  Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion

N>N  Personal answerYes, and immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses

N>N  Personal answerNo, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote

N>N  Personal answerNo, but allow for grassroots donations by volunteering individuals

N>N  Personal answerDepends on the circumstances. Ideally, the business cycle should be allowed to run its course, but particularly vicious downturns would warrant stimulus, if monetary policy is insufficient to address recessions.

N>N  Personal answerBoth, they protect the workers, but also sometimes bar the workers.

N>N  Personal answerNo, increase consumer incentives to recycle these products instead

N>N  Personal answerWelfare should not exist

N>N  Personal answerYes, but also increase training requirements police

N>N  Personal answerNo. There are other places in the budget to cut.

N>N  Personal answerYes, any citizen who has a job and, therefore, contributes to the economy should be allowed to vote

N>N  Personal answerNo, tax returns have nothing to do with their ability to perform their duties

N>N  Personal answerI don’t know

N>N  Personal answerYes, but I also support investments in clean alternatives

N>N  Personal answerNo. Flag burning is protected under the 1st Amendment via Texas v. Johnson in 1989 and again in 1990 in United States v. Eichman

N>N  Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion

N>N  Personal answerNot well informed on the topic.

N>N  Personal answerYes, and provide more free public transportation

N>N  Personal answerDecrease, our current military spending is extremely high and we could always cut back marginally, roughly $400 billion is a large enough amount to both sustain a strong military larger than any other country, and also put a large sum of money back towards our economic system.

N>N  Personal answerYes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes

N>N  Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

N>N  Personal answerYes, and abolish all victimless crimes

N>N  Personal answerYes, if it can be proved they are monopolies and detrimental to american society

N>N  Personal answerThat should be left totally to the discretion of those private companies.

N>N  Personal answerNo, the federal government should not fund sanctuary cities. however the federal government cannot ban sanctuary cities since this is within the jurisdiction of the states and cities involved. Let state's/local governments decide if they want to make their city a "Sanctuary City" or fund sanctuary cities within their state.

N>N  Personal answerI believe that both private and public schools should be improved, and parents should have the freedom to choose where they’d like to send their children.

N>N  Personal answerI'm not too familiar on this topic