@93VKG4L

9>9  Personal answerPro-choice

9>9  Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples

9>9  Personal answerRegardless, enact regulations to cap the price of drugs

9>9  Personal answerYes, and do not privatize any services

9>9  Personal answerReform to a flat tax

9>9  Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender

9>9  Personal answerNo, tuition costs should be tied to inflation

9>9  Personal answerYes, but I believe a test should only cover crucial subjects such as language and laws that make sure that said immigrant fully understands the content, this would prevent new coming foreigners from taking advantage of aid from the country due to how easily residency was granted from a 'simple knowledge test'

9>9  Personal answerNo, this will only cause prices to increase in a never ending cycle

9>9  Personal answerYes, but after they have finished serving their sentence

9>9  Personal answerNo, but the cost of education should be drastically reduced for everyone

9>9  Personal answerYes, and ban all guns from public use

9>9  Personal answerLower, but eliminate deductions and loop holes

9>9  Personal answerI am satisfied with the current system

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only selective logging, no clearcutting, and a plan for regrowth

9>9  Personal answerNo, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence

9>9  Personal answerNo, the current policy is sufficient

9>9  Personal answerYes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

9>9  Personal answerYes, we should respect all cultural traditions

9>9  Personal answerProvincial, but with federal funding and regulated standards

9>9  Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

9>9  Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

9>9  Personal answerNo, because the Taliban government stems from a terrorist organization that has ideals and beliefs that disregard human rights and take actions that are too extreme and violent. Does not matter how 'official' they have become.

9>9  Personal answerNo, but reduce interest rates

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, they should be integrated into our society as citizens

9>9  Personal answerYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

9>9  Personal answerYes, for most but not all drugs

9>9  Personal answerDecrease, companies are currently taking advantage of this program to decrease wages

9>9  Personal answerNo, implement foreign buyer and vacancy taxes instead

9>9  Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate

9>9  Personal answerNo, because it would defeat the entire purpose of having available shelters or housing in the first place. These establishments are meant to be much safer than having to live in a public park or woods. However, I don't believe that the penalty for doing so anyway should be a 'major' criminal offense.

9>9  Personal answerYes, but not at the expense of farmland and green space

9>9  Personal answerYes, provided a strict psychological evaluation shows they are no longer a threat to society

9>9  Personal answerNo, increase consumer incentives to recycle these products instead

9>9  Personal answerNo, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote

9>9  Personal answerYes, and the government should limit the number of homes that can be bought by a single person or corporation

9>9  Personal answerYes, but limit the amount they can donate

9>9  Personal answerNo, increase sanctions on countries that are the top contributors of global pollution instead

9>9  Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities

9>9  Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment

9>9  Personal answerNo, the minimum voting age where it currently sits (18 years of age) is good.

9>9  Personal answerYes, and increase taxes

9>9  Personal answerNo, funding should come from their members

9>9  Personal answerLet each province decide

9>9  Personal answerNationalize. Privatizing will increase the costs because it would be in the hands of corporations.

9>9  Personal answerYes, and the tax should be at least 5%

9>9  Personal answerDecrease, and deny aid to countries that harbor or promote terrorism

9>9  Personal answerNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal

9>9  Personal answerProvincially managed but with federal standards to ensure consistency

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions

9>9  Personal answerYes, NAFTA helps lower the prices of consumer products

9>9  Personal answerIncrease, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

9>9  Personal answerNo, it is a slippery slope towards a police state

9>9  Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation

9>9  Personal answerThe end goal should be to eventually get all forms of public transportation to run on electric power over time. But the usage of fossil fuels from automobiles should not receive increased taxes.

9>9  Personal answerNo, we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead

9>9  Personal answerNo, it's safer to have human operators instead of relying on drones for commercial purposes.