Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
C>C Personal answerPro-choice |
Healthcare › Mental Health
C>C Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
C>C Personal answerSchools should have at least one armed personnel that has had the training to hold a gun in case of security incidents. Perhaps not a teacher but maybe a security personnel that can move around the school freely in case of incidents. |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
C>C Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples |
Social › Gay Marriage
C>C Personal answerup to the states. |
the Economy › Taxes
C>C Personal answerTax according to income. Rich should pay slightly more and adjust for those in lower income brackets. |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
C>C Personal answerNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
C>C Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
C>C Personal answerThe minimum wage was started to put a limit on how low to pay the young workers. In todays time, more and more single parents, senior citizens, and college students are working skilled jobs at minimum wage rates. Instead of raising minimum wage, we should reclassify what a minimum wage job is. Furthermore, we should establish minimum wage rates for different age groups, and have a tier system that classifies each job in tiers. Each tier's minimum rage should go up to the last tiers highest wage. Having 3-4 tiers in each age group would reduce the number of people at or under the poverty line, it will create better workers, and allow for less turn over. It will also reduce the number of unemployed workers. Jobs such as fast food, retail, gas station attendants etc, would be worked mainly by high school and college students, leaving more skilled jobs for working adults. |
Social › Euthanasia
C>C Personal answerYes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
C>C Personal answerYes, this system guarantees healthcare for everyone |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
C>C Personal answerYes, but do not deport them if they fail, they can still remain Legal Residents until they pass the Civics test. And we should have mandatory Civic classrooms in all public schools. |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
C>C Personal answerYes, and ban all guns from public use |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
C>C Personal answerYes, for all minors, elders (65+), pregnant women, new mothers, people with physical or mental issues, and involuntary unemployed willing to train and accept job offers and as a replacement for the current welfare system. |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
C>C Personal answerYes, as long as it is safe for them to return to their country |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
C>C Personal answerI don't have enough information on this topic. |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
C>C Personal answerNo, but it should be highly encouraged and the government should provide cheap language lessons |
Social › Death Penalty
C>C Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
Social › Transgender Athletes
C>C Personal answerYes, but only if they meet certain diagnostic criteria for fairness |
Social › Niqāb
C>C Personal answerYes, but their identity must be privately verified by a female staff member |
Crime › Private Prisons
C>C Personal answerYes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
C>C Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Elections
C>C Personal answerYes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler |
Social › Women in Combat
C>C Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
C>C Personal answerYes |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
C>C Personal answerYes, but only if there is proof someone died from the drugs they trafficked |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
C>C Personal answerNo, but decriminalize drugs that offer medicinal benefits such as marijuana |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
C>C Personal answerNo, but there should be a program that to combat addiction where voluntary signups would be safe from prosecution. |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
C>C Personal answerYes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence, as long as the crime was not committed while in office, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime, and as long as they are not under investigation of a crime, |
Foreign Policy › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
C>C Personal answerNot enough knowledge of the issue |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
C>C Personal answerIncrease, our economy relies on businesses hiring the highest skilled workers at the lowest cost |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
C>C Personal answerYes, but provide treatment for those testing positive |
the Environment › Fracking
C>C Personal answerNo, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking |
the Environment › Animal Testing
C>C Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
Healthcare › Marijuana
C>C Personal answerYes, but only for medical use |
the Economy › Labor Unions
C>C Personal answerI'm not informed about this topic to make a decision. |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
C>C Personal answerNo, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote |
Foreign Policy › Israel Boycott
C>C Personal answerNo, this is a violation of free speech |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
C>C Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion |
the Economy › Welfare
C>C Personal answerReform the system, ensure welfare recipients are actively doing what they need to do to remove themselves from welfare. Oversight need to be better. A pipeline out of the system needs to be created to limit dependency on welfare. welfare should not be lifelong. |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
C>C Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Spending
C>C Personal answerDont' Know |
the Economy › Domestic Jobs
C>C Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion |
Science › Nuclear Energy
C>C Personal answerYes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
C>C Personal answerI don’t know |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
C>C Personal answerYes, and it should be illegal to burn any nation’s flag |
Transportation › Public Transportation
C>C Personal answerYes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
C>C Personal answerNeither, They should only increase the military spending when it necessary. |
the Economy › NAFTA
C>C Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
C>C Personal answerYes, every citizen deserves the right to vote |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
C>C Personal answerYes, but eliminate all tax loopholes associated with off shore accounts and mandate the reporting of offshore income. |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
C>C Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Pensions
C>C Personal answerinsufficient knowledge |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
C>C Personal answerYes, the should be required to take classes to better their chances of becoming law abiding citizens. Classes such as stress and anger management, education skills which will enable them to find productive work |
the Economy › Tariffs
C>C Personal answerYes, but only on countries we believe to be using unsustainable or illegal (child labor) methods, or producing using stolen information |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
C>C Personal answerRenegotiate TPP so that environmental protection is accounted for and wage standards are uniform among member countries. |
Immigration › Sanctuary Cities
C>C Personal answerNo, the federal government should not fund sanctuary cities. however the federal government cannot ban sanctuary cities since this is within the jurisdiction of the states and cities involved. Let state's/local governments decide if they want to make their city a "Sanctuary City" or fund sanctuary cities within their state. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 16 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y
▲ 3991 reply3 agree5 disagree
@ISIDEWITH submitted…2wks2W
▲ 469 replies
@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y
▲ 7710 replies3 agree6 disagree
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.