Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
B>B Personal answerPro-choice |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
B>B Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
B>B Personal answerYes |
Social › Gay Marriage
B>B Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Taxes
B>B Personal answerIf everyone contributed the same amount there would be no animosity between employees in different roles |
Education › University Tuition
B>B Personal answerYes for provincial schools. Private schools should be able to do what they want |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
B>B Personal answerYes, and adjust it every year according to inflation |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
B>B Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
B>B Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
B>B Personal answerMore |
Immigration › Immigration
B>B Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
B>B Personal answerYes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production |
Education › Student Loan Debt
B>B Personal answerNo |
Immigration › High Risk Immigrant Ban
B>B Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
B>B Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
B>B Personal answerNo |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
B>B Personal answerYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
B>B Personal answerYes, for most but not all drugs |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
B>B Personal answerNo |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
B>B Personal answerYes |
Housing › Affordable Housing
B>B Personal answerNo |
Crime › Parole Hearings
B>B Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
B>B Personal answerNo |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
B>B Personal answerNo |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
B>B Personal answerNo |
Crime › Defunding the Police
B>B Personal answerNo |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
B>B Personal answerYes |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
B>B Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Spending
B>B Personal answerYes, We shouldn’t be adding to debt to make certain groups happy. No matter race, creed, or religion. We are all the same. Therefore, money should go to services that everyone uses. Every type of person drives, so things like pothole maintenance, which is for everyone should have priority over a social service for a singular group. |
Technology › Ethical Artificial Intelligence
B>B Personal answerThis one is tough. So many benefits and so many cons |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
B>B Personal answerDecrease |
Science › Nuclear Energy
B>B Personal answerNo |
Science › Genetic Engineering
B>B Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Public Transportation
B>B Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
B>B Personal answerNeither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
B>B Personal answerYes |
Science › Lab Grown Meat
B>B Personal answerNo |
Transportation › Green Transportation
B>B Personal answerDepends on the cost. If fuel is cheaper than electric, then I’m fine with that. It would be great to have electric but not at the cost to Citizens. So many tax hikes this year, why we we do that to our people |
Transportation › Fuel Efficiency Requirements
B>B Personal answerOnly if they get a benefit. Can’t impose something and make people acquire the cost. In the states electric vehicles didn’t have a fee and now they imposed it. People bought those vehicles to save money in other places and still got dinged. Make an incentive and keep your word |
National Security › National Identification System
B>B Personal answerYes |
Education › Charter Schools
B>B Personal answerYes |
National Security › Backdoor Access to Encrypted Communications
B>B Personal answerNo |
Technology › Social Media Regulation
B>B Personal answerYes |
Technology › Cryptocurrencies
B>B Personal answerNo, and underprivileged citizens deserve the same financial opportunities and services that traditional banks offer the wealthy |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH submitted…4 days4D
▲ 86 replies1 agree
@ISIDEWITH asked…3 days3D
▲ 285617 replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
