Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
9>9 Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples |
Social › Gay Marriage
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Education › University Tuition
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only cap tuition to each student's first year rate |
the Economy › Taxes
9>9 Personal answerYes, in the form of land value tax, and decrease other forms of taxes, especially the GST/HST |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
9>9 Personal answerYes, and do not privatize any services |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
9>9 Personal answerYes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
9>9 Personal answerYes, and adjust it every year according to inflation |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
9>9 Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
9>9 Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as it is safe for them to return to their country |
Education › Student Loan Debt
9>9 Personal answerNo, but reduce interest rates |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
9>9 Personal answerYes, aboriginals should be further compensated for their hardships and use of resources |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
9>9 Personal answerNo, but decriminalize drugs that offer medicinal benefits such as marijuana |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
9>9 Personal answerNo, but increase tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products |
Immigration › Immigration
9>9 Personal answerNo, as the immigration itself is not at issue, but the government must ensure the barriers for immigrants to find work in their relevant fields is easier - doctors should have a pathway to being a doctor in Canada, engineers should have a pathway to professional engineering in Canada, etc. |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
9>9 Personal answerYes, drug abuse should be treated as a health issue, not a criminal issue |
Immigration › High Risk Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answerYes, but "high risk" should be used sparingly so as to avoid exhausting border control and immigration officers with overwork and over-vigilance |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
9>9 Personal answerYes, and purchase of Canadian real estate should permanently be limited to permanent residents and citizens of Canada |
Crime › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
9>9 Personal answerYes, any citizen that pays taxes should be allowed to vote |
Crime › Parole Hearings
9>9 Personal answerYes, and we should provide more rehabilitation programs for prisoners |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
9>9 Personal answerNo, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote |
Housing › Affordable Housing
9>9 Personal answerYes, although the government should also consider using its powers to create mixed-zoning areas (e.g., blending commercial spaces into residential zones) and reducing the ability of civilians to unfairly interfere with construction designs |
Technology › Ethical Artificial Intelligence
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Science › Genetic Engineering
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Government Spending
9>9 Personal answerNo, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Science › Nuclear Energy
9>9 Personal answerYes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives |
National Security › Facial Recognition
9>9 Personal answerNo, I trust the technology but not the humans that could misuse it |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
9>9 Personal answerNo, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
9>9 Personal answerIncrease, but Canada should be more careful with how it coordinates that spending so as to achieve better outcomes |
Transportation › Public Transportation
9>9 Personal answerYes, but the government should also do some retrospectives and preventative measures on reducing the cost per kilometre of track or new service |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
9>9 Personal answerIncrease, as long as the investments in military spending demonstrate a pathway to civilian products or civilian benefit (e.g., GPS) |
Transportation › Green Transportation
9>9 Personal answerYes, but with a strong focus on battery-less solutions - overhead wire and third rail solutions are more than sufficient with good planning and reduced interference in engineering design |
Science › Lab Grown Meat
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as there is both wide agreement amongst independent research and health bodies that lab-grown meat is safe long-term for consumption and will reduce carbon emissions in total |
National Security › National Identification System
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Diesel Emission Standards
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Education › Charter Schools
9>9 Personal answerNo, and education should not be privatized |
the Environment › EV Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerNo, the subsidies should go towards operating costs of public transit |
National Security › Backdoor Access to Encrypted Communications
9>9 Personal answerNo, since backdoors can always be exploited by bad actors, but technology companies must be held in contempt of justice if they refuse to provide information in a timely manner with harsh penalties |
Technology › Social Media Regulation
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Technology › Cryptocurrencies
9>9 Personal answerYes, and ban the use of crytocurrencies |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
▲ 4.5k90 replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
