@B3K9X78

B>B  Personal answerIn this case, if it is done through creating problems and using illegal methods, then the government should restrict it based on the situation because it would harm the economy but there should also be monitoring by a single operation because too many hands on a single problem would cause a problem to spiral without fixing any issues.

B>B  Personal answerYes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies

B>B  Personal answerYes, and do not privatize any services

B>B  Personal answerLower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations

B>B  Personal answerYes

B>B  Personal answerYes, and adjust it every year according to inflation

B>B  Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

B>B  Personal answerYes, as long as it is safe for them to return to their country

B>B  Personal answerYes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

B>B  Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry

B>B  Personal answerNo, create a separate category for transgender athletes to compete against each other

B>B  Personal answerMake the process easier for skilled workers by properly having a system that isn't just based on quick results but having essential workers to improve the economy and screening individuals for criminal backgrounds as well as ensuring that refugees are properly documented to be running away from something that is proven to be harmful to them and regularly review to update any pre-existing issues to make things make sense, but in the terms of national security, those should be brought up in that case when it comes to criminal backgrounds, since most people aren't always as bad as they seem, it depends because it is a big issue that hasn't been brought up.

B>B  Personal answerYes, and forgive all student load debt

B>B  Personal answerProper screening and determining should be made to prevent that from happening with reliable experts to showcase the difference between a refugee, terrorist or spy for the average person.

B>B  Personal answerIt depends, but it should be done correctly in mind with allowing them to do their own thing whilst allowing people to have their own advantages by lowering taxes and ensuring that nothing is harmed whilst training is needed to prevent the government from using its power to force them out of their homes to cut more trees, in a way there should be a way to prevent climate change from affecting the world.

B>B  Personal answerNo, we should pass tougher drug laws

B>B  Personal answerNo, this would encourage drug use and lower funding for rehabilitation centers

B>B  Personal answerYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

B>B  Personal answerIt depends, if people are looking for a better life, then they shouldn't but if it is done in a way where it causes problems, then it should be implemented that foreigners need to do a proper check with the government to ensure they aren't trying to make issues that are ongoing occur more often, but it also depends because if taxes are increased, then it just makes the chance of someone buying a home leave for cheaper replacements, to sum it up, I think it should be their primary residence but with proper monitoring to ensure they have to become citizens.

B>B  Personal answerYes, and ban all disposable products that are not made of at least 75% of biodegradable material

B>B  Personal answerYes, provided a strict psychological evaluation shows they are no longer a threat to society

B>B  Personal answerYes, but only after living in the country for 5 years

B>B  Personal answerIt depends, but if it is done unfairly by other means, then the government can't but if it is done through the right means, then they could but there would have to be stipulations as to not create problems or loopholes that make no sense because there should be transparency in this case.

B>B  Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities

B>B  Personal answerNo, come up with local solutions that work for each community

B>B  Personal answerNo, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote

B>B  Personal answerNo, focus on ending tax evasion instead

B>B  Personal answerYes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives

B>B  Personal answerYes, but only if it’s tightly regulated and used with transparency

B>B  Personal answerDecrease, and deny aid to countries that harbor or promote terrorism

B>B  Personal answerYes

B>B  Personal answerIt depends, but I think it should follow how the US does it when it comes to ensuring that people are paid properly because if we make people pay more, then it deters people but if things are made to be efficient, then people wouldn't mind paying more because it saves them time, but the main issue is putting that into action, so a temporary solution would be to update infrastructure by making old systems have proper network connections in the case of Japan's strategy and allowing people to spend an amount based on what's less expensive, instead of constantly raising taxes because of inflation, though I don't understand the question.

B>B  Personal answerNo, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability

B>B  Personal answerIncrease, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

B>B  Personal answerNo, we need more long-term studies to ensure safety

B>B  Personal answerDepends, but I don't think it would change anything because both are already being implemented and aren't always of best use, so I think it's just important in the short-term to do both because of money being spent improperly and instead using that to work on key issues that harm the economy but using things that gain money instead of printing so much to keep everything running because these still add up on costs, though I probably don't understand the question.

B>B  Personal answerIf they are properly evaluated to be non-violent and are willing to protect people in society, then they should be released to benefit both themselves and society whilst ensuring they're going to be working with the government under strict obligations to follow.

B>B  Personal answerYes

B>B  Personal answerNo, and education should not be privatized

B>B  Personal answerYes

B>B  Personal answerYes

B>B  Personal answerNo

B>B  Personal answerIt depends but I think it should be both in the sense of monitoring cryptocurrencies and allowing citizens or anyone to have the opportunity to have better financial standards because of income displacements and laws being passed, so there should be a way to bring structure on both sides of the table.