Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Domestic Policy › Government Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds |
Healthcare › Prescription Drugs
4>4 Personal answerNO - we can not afford it. However, have drug prices monitored to keep costs down. Purchase price should not exceed 100% markup of manufacturer's cost. |
Education › University Tuition
4>4 Personal answerYES - I think the Federal government should pay the full fee of Bachelor Degree program and 50% for Master's program (PHD is full responsibility of student). But all recipients must work 5 consecutive years within Canada or for a Canadian owned company; if they choose not to, then the full cost of university will have to be repaid within 5 - 8 years. |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
4>4 Personal answerNO - but offer free post-secondary education for military service. |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
4>4 Personal answerYes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production |
Healthcare › Dental Coverage
4>4 Personal answerYES - annual cleaning and check-up needs to be included. Anything beyond that is individual's responsibility. |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
4>4 Personal answerKeep current rates but eliminate deductions and loop holes |
Social › Niqāb
4>4 Personal answerYes, but their identity must be privately verified by a female staff member |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
4>4 Personal answerI am satisfied with the current system |
the Environment › Logging
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
4>4 Personal answerYES, with understanding that a full accounting must be submitted and reviewed on a yearly basis, before annual amounts given. We also need to encourage assimilation into society through education in ALL schools (city and residential). The more they live apart from society, the more the racial issues will persist. |
Healthcare › Healthcare
4>4 Personal answerPROVINCIAL, but with Federal funding based on population (i.e. $10/person, so each province would get only the amount for their population) |
Social › Women in Combat
4>4 Personal answerYes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Universal Child Care
4>4 Personal answerYES, but only if they meet the following criteria: * low income and/or single parent families * stay-at-home parent * families with disabled children |
Immigration › Immigration
4>4 Personal answerNO - but assign more staff to fully and properly assess each applicant. |
the Environment › Keystone Pipeline
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
4>4 Personal answerYES, but only for those with a history of drug use, and if positive, make rehab mandatory in order to continue receiving benefits. |
Elections › Electoral Reform
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Quebec Sovereignty
4>4 Personal answerLet citizens VOTE - and make it the final vote on the issue - with legal documents preventing this issue from being raised in the next 100 years. The issue waits time and money. |
Domestic Policy › Commuter Rail
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Northern Gateway Pipeline
4>4 Personal answerNo, not until all the Aboriginal bands this project affects agree to it |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
4>4 Personal answerIncrease |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Campaign Finance
4>4 Personal answerNO - public donations only and have a maximum allowed for each party (eg. $10 million per year) |
Elections › Prime Minister Term Limits
4>4 Personal answerYes, and limited to two terms |
Crime › Parole Hearings
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Free Trade
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Pension Tax
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Worker Strikes
4>4 Personal answerYES, but establish a labour court to prevent strikes. |
Domestic Policy › Energy Sector
4>4 Personal answerPrivatize, but increase environmental and regulatory oversight for price control |
the Economy › Old Age Pensions
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only for low income pensioners |
Domestic Policy › National Daycare
4>4 Personal answerLet each province decide |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
4>4 Personal answerNo, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability |
Immigration › Temporary Foreign Workers
4>4 Personal answerNeither, maintain the current amount |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
4>4 Personal answerI would like to see all countries make contributions to IMF and have the UN distribute as needed. IMF would have to provide an annual accounting to each contributing country prior to receiving their annual contribution. |
Education › Postsecondary Education
4>4 Personal answerFEDERAL - we want to keep intellectual talent within Canada (see German & Nordic education systems). |
Domestic Policy › Senate
4>4 Personal answerELECT and make it mandatory that they be non-partisan, with no history of supporting any political party. Also, give them a limited yearly budget for there use - with no deductions, expenses allowed (the budget should suffice for their travel, food, gas, accommodation expenses). |
the Economy › Employment Insurance
4>4 Personal answerYes, but with limits set for workers with above average seasonal salaries |
the Economy › Income Splitting
4>4 Personal answerNO - tax according to TOTAL household income for family |
the Economy › Bitcoin
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Pension Premiums
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Long Form Census
4>4 Personal answerYES, but make it an online census and emailed to those email addresses given on their income tax submissions. If needed, offer paper format to those isolated areas. |
Domestic Policy › Copyright
4>4 Personal answerLet the free market, instead of the government, decide |
Transportation › Commercial Drones
4>4 Personal answerYES, but at a cost and with a licence. Drones have the potential for intrusion into the private realm and this will hopefully be preventative. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…6yrs6Y
▲ 5.4k180 replies
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
▲ 4.4k85 replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
