Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
B>B Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
B>B Personal answerYes |
Social › Gay Marriage
B>B Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Taxes
B>B Personal answerYes |
Education › University Tuition
B>B Personal answerYes, and the government should provide free university education |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
B>B Personal answerNo, only if they have entered the country illegally |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
B>B Personal answerYes, and adjust it every year according to inflation |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
B>B Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
B>B Personal answerLess |
Immigration › Immigration
B>B Personal answerYes, in terms of stricter screening, but make it easier for skilled workers in sectors most in need, and also for refugees. |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
B>B Personal answerYes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production |
Education › Student Loan Debt
B>B Personal answerYes |
Immigration › High Risk Immigrant Ban
B>B Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
B>B Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
B>B Personal answerThis again is too broad. This should be a case by case decision. |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
B>B Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
B>B Personal answerI fall undecided. I understand the concept and its proposed benefits but I also understand some of the arguments against it. I don’t think it’s enough to do this and I do not think it can be done without other resources first being highly increased. |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
B>B Personal answerBy foreigners do we mean those new to Canada or those whole do not reside in Canada? I think there should be restrictions for certain, but I’m unsure if a ban. I believe this question is referring to those whom do not reside in Canada. |
Elections › Electoral Reform
B>B Personal answerI think changes need to be made, but I’m unsure of what the best structure would be. I plan to dive into this deeper and learn more on this topic. I think the best option is likely a hybrid of new and existing. |
Crime › Parole Hearings
B>B Personal answerYes, provided a strict psychological evaluation shows they are no longer a threat to society |
Housing › Affordable Housing
B>B Personal answerYes |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
B>B Personal answerYes, but only after living in the country for 5 years |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
B>B Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
B>B Personal answerNo, not ALL, but apply stricter production restrictions and more incentives for eco friendly options. For example, in cases where there is a widely accepted alternative, more restrictions could be placed (for example, egg cartons, milk containers) |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
B>B Personal answerYes, but only in response to extreme situations |
Crime › Defunding the Police
B>B Personal answerYes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls |
the Economy › Government Spending
B>B Personal answerThis is too broad a topic and requires situational decision making. |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
B>B Personal answerMaybe! Maybe not! I’m unsure. I think we have to consider the vulnerability of our youth; they may be easily manipulated or restricted. However, I think the input of our youth is very valuable. It becomes very tricky and dangerous to begin imposing restrictions on who can and cannot vote. Making changes that further restrict voting is a huge NO to me, and that includes intellectual testing as that could be subject to bias; this could also set precedence for future restrictions that may impose upon human rights for minority groups. I think the best approach would be to set high levels of competency and legal expectation for political leaders and representatives. In tandem it is important to provide more access to education, and to hold education systems to a high level of unbias and truthful representation. |
Technology › Ethical Artificial Intelligence
B>B Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
B>B Personal answerThis is too broad a topic. It should be decided on a case by case basis. |
Science › Genetic Engineering
B>B Personal answerThis is too broad a topic to narrow down to a simple yes or no. |
Transportation › Public Transportation
B>B Personal answerYes, and provide more free public transportation |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
B>B Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
B>B Personal answerNo, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability |
Science › Lab Grown Meat
B>B Personal answerNo, we need more long-term studies to ensure safety |
Transportation › Green Transportation
B>B Personal answerNo, not all, just focus on infrastructure that is easy and cost-effective to replace |
National Security › National Identification System
B>B Personal answerI feel like I would need to dive into this more, to land on a solid opinion. At base level it seems logical and functional. But I can understand there being concerns and issues. |
Education › Charter Schools
B>B Personal answerYes, but not at the expense of funding public schools |
National Security › Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Defense
B>B Personal answerYes, but with very strict oversight and regulations |
National Security › Backdoor Access to Encrypted Communications
B>B Personal answerOnly in circumstances where a judge orders that information be disclosed for investigation where a great deal of information evidence or multiple allegations are provided, to show just reason to investigate. |
Transportation › Frequent Flier Regulation
B>B Personal answerYes |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
▲ 6.6k123 replies
@ISIDEWITH asked…2wks2W
▲ 1.5k3.3k replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
