Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Domestic Policy › Government Surveillance
3>3 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Prescription Drugs
3>3 Personal answerRegardless, enact regulations to cap the price of drugs |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
3>3 Personal answerNo, and implement a two tier public/private system |
Education › University Tuition
3>3 Personal answerRegardless, privatize education and let the free market determine the tuition rates |
Healthcare › Dental Coverage
3>3 Personal answerNo, emergency care is already included, preventative care should be an individual's responsibility. |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
3>3 Personal answerKeep current rates but eliminate deductions and loop holes |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
3>3 Personal answerMore |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
3>3 Personal answerNo, and the current government is over-regulating businesses |
the Environment › Logging
3>3 Personal answerYes, but only selective logging, no clearcutting, and a plan for regrowth |
Social › Niqāb
3>3 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Immigration
3>3 Personal answerYes, and regularly review recent immigrants to ensure they have become productive citizens |
Healthcare › Healthcare
3>3 Personal answerProvincial, but with a public/ private hybrid model. |
Social › Women in Combat
3>3 Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men |
the Economy › Universal Child Care
3>3 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
3>3 Personal answerCertainly not if it means unnaturally higher cost to consumers. |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
3>3 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Keystone Pipeline
3>3 Personal answerYes, if the landowners are fairly compensated |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
3>3 Personal answerYes, and immediately terminate benefits for anyone testing positive |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
3>3 Personal answerDecrease, and the government should provide more incentives to prepare our citizens for these jobs |
Elections › Electoral Reform
3>3 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Pension Tax
3>3 Personal answerYes, but only for those making over $50,000 per year |
Domestic Policy › Commuter Rail
3>3 Personal answerNot if they need rural dollars to do it. |
the Environment › Northern Gateway Pipeline
3>3 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Parole Hearings
3>3 Personal answerNo, and reinstate the death penalty for heinous premeditated crimes |
Elections › Campaign Finance
3>3 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Prime Minister Term Limits
3>3 Personal answerYes, and limited to two terms |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
3>3 Personal answerNo, recession is a natural cycle that purges excess |
the Economy › Free Trade
3>3 Personal answerYes, but only if strong protections for our national resources and workers are enacted with each trade deal |
Domestic Policy › Quebec Sovereignty
3>3 Personal answerYes, as long as they take their share of debt |
Domestic Policy › Worker Strikes
3>3 Personal answerNO public servant should be able to strike, or even bargain collectively. |
Immigration › Temporary Foreign Workers
3>3 Personal answerDecrease |
the Economy › Old Age Pensions
3>3 Personal answerYes, but only for low income pensioners |
Domestic Policy › Energy Sector
3>3 Personal answerPrivatize, as government is sure to create entitled fat cats. |
Domestic Policy › National Daycare
3>3 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
3>3 Personal answerDecrease, until we drastically reduce our national budget deficit |
Education › Postsecondary Education
3>3 Personal answerNeither... should be privatized. |
Domestic Policy › Senate
3>3 Personal answerElect |
the Economy › Employment Insurance
3>3 Personal answerYes, if they pay into it |
the Economy › Income Splitting
3>3 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Bitcoin
3>3 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Pension Premiums
3>3 Personal answerRegardless, allow employees the option to opt-out of the CPP and invest in a private pension plan |
Domestic Policy › Long Form Census
3>3 Personal answerDo nothing to add cost to the taxpayer. |
Domestic Policy › Copyright
3>3 Personal answerLet the free market, instead of the government, decide |
Transportation › Commercial Drones
3>3 Personal answerSure, if it helps profits in the private sector without job loss. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y
▲ 4161 reply3 agree6 disagree
@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y
▲ 7710 replies3 agree6 disagree
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
