Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
8>8 Personal answerPro-choice |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gay Marriage
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Taxes
8>8 Personal answerDefine rich. Are you talking about annual incomes here? Or net wealth? Or do you mean anyone who doesn't live below the poverty line. This idea of taxing the rich in this country is misleading. It's the upper end of the middle class that seem to pay for everything. The rich certainly don't help much. |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Education › University Tuition
8>8 Personal answerTo that level that makes if fair for the students, professors, and the taxpayer. |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
8>8 Personal answerYes and make it a living wage. Absolutely, and dismantle EI and welfare agencies (at least as they currently exist) to pay for it. Makes good sense. A giant gov't dept like EI is another giant Canadian bureaucracy that sucks too much money from the system. We don't get good value for it and would be better spent giving to those that lose their jobs, or are unemployable. |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
8>8 Personal answerMore |
the Environment › Logging
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Immigration
8>8 Personal answerIncrease to solidify our tax base and establish a policy that allows an adequate number of skilled workers balanced with a responsible number of refugees and those from less developed countries. |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
8>8 Personal answerYes, fair enough, but then cut back on some of the other unneeded regulations |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answerDuring a time of heightened political tension in certain areas of the world it makes sense scrutinize immigrants from some regions. Sorry, it's not being discriminatory...only sensible considering some groups score points for hitting soft targets. |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
8>8 Personal answerYes, but I don't agree with how the funds are currently allocated |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Marijuana
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Parole Hearings
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Northern Gateway Pipeline
8>8 Personal answerYes, if it it done safely and respects all stakeholders. There is still a market for oil. Why not let Western Canada access the market. How does a country, so proud of universal health care, pay for it without a reliable source of revenue. You can't keep tax punishing people who try to get ahead (and it's not the rich, by the way). |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only after living in the country for 10 years |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
8>8 Personal answerFor 1st time home owners |
the Environment › Local Environmental Guidelines
8>8 Personal answerI don't know. I guess if I was convinced this could be a workable solution. How does the UN develop it's guidelines? I don't think this organization if very competent and often politically motivated. |
Crime › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerdon't know enough about it. |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
8>8 Personal answerI don't believe someone at 16 or 17 has a clear grip on the issues are are too easily quickly influenced by ideology. |
the Economy › Government Spending
8>8 Personal answerYes, but make the public sector more efficient...please, please, please. I see this as the biggest (by a country mile) source of waste and mis management in Canada. Monopolies are never a good idea - obviously. And we don't need government monopolies to prevent us from becoming "American". Seems the be the biggest fall back for proponents of a government workforce to deliver everything. No one wants an American health care system. But we can certainly have a system more efficient, timely, and less expensive than the way ours has developed. It's hopeless, and throwing more money at it isn't the answer. |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
8>8 Personal answerDepends on the overall wealth of the non-resident. |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
8>8 Personal answerIncrease |
Science › Nuclear Energy
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Education › Postsecondary Education
8>8 Personal answerProvincial |
Transportation › Public Transportation
8>8 Personal answerYes, but consider ways to reduce wasteful spending in public systems as part of this strategy. Yes more public transportation but less redundant admin. Should work in tandem |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
8>8 Personal answerSpending isn't the issue. It is how the money is spent. |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Education › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerOh gawd. Is this another federally funded/CBC survey designed to mock Alberta? Anyway, yes I would support this only because more of it might force the public systems to work responsibly and efficiently. I work in the public education system so I can say that. Some teachers I work with do not care at all about the students, parents, or the hard working people who fund the system. Only about themselves and their entitlements |
Transportation › Commercial Drones
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH submitted…5 days5D
▲ 86 replies1 agree
@ISIDEWITH asked…3 days3D
▲ 342779 replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
