Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
B>B Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
B>B Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Taxes
B>B Personal answerYes |
Education › University Tuition
B>B Personal answerFree college and university. |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
B>B Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
B>B Personal answerEvery single answer to this question has proven to be insulting hand-wringing and burden shuffling that ends up piling more stigma on top of mental illness sufferers to the extent that that phrase, "mental illness", has become a cudgel for gun psychos to further stymy and suppress gun control advancement and enforcement. Nobody needs a gun. |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
B>B Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
B>B Personal answerIf that works, maybe. Why not just eliminate extractive industry? |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
B>B Personal answerPrivate healthcare is not healthcare. A profit motive is impossible to reconcile with helping anyone. |
Immigration › Immigration
B>B Personal answerBorders are fake. |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Elections
B>B Personal answerCorporations do it all the time. Borders are fake. I somehow care less about government bodies like the us cia interfering in elections and I resent the use of the word foreign. |
Education › Student Loan Debt
B>B Personal answerAll student debt. Forgive all of it. |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
B>B Personal answerSince capitalism can only favour ecological devastation through extraction and the term renewable means less than nothing regarding sustainability, probably. |
Immigration › High Risk Immigrant Ban
B>B Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
B>B Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
B>B Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
B>B Personal answerYes |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
B>B Personal answerCriminal disenfranchisement should be a crime. |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
B>B Personal answerHomes shouldn't be something you can buy if you're not gonna live there. |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
B>B Personal answerThere should be no such thing as a single-use culinary product. Not to mention the criminal misuse of the term "biodegradable" that deliberately fools people into thinking polylactic acid-containing materials are somehow ecologically sound. |
the Environment › Fracking
B>B Personal answerNo |
Housing › Affordable Housing
B>B Personal answerDepends what you mean by homes. There are at least that many vacant dwellings in Canada already and half as many unhoused people. This is a way bigger mess than giving money to corporate developers is going to be able to solve. |
the Environment › Northern Gateway Pipeline
B>B Personal answerNo |
Crime › Parole Hearings
B>B Personal answerYes |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
B>B Personal answerIf the busted faux democracies of today are gonna pretend as though frequent elections of representatives can ever yield progress in the face of the disinformation deluge brought on by media and the internet, then everyone needs to understand that long-term planning is impossible. If you live somewhere, you're part of that community and deserve to speak. |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
B>B Personal answerNo |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
B>B Personal answerYounger people are more informed on average so sure, why not? |
Technology › Ethical Artificial Intelligence
B>B Personal answerWhat exists today that is termed """AI""" is not intelligent. It is a plagiarism blackbox that has and can only be used for disinformative purposes by thieves. |
the Economy › Government Spending
B>B Personal answerNo |
Science › Nuclear Energy
B>B Personal answerNo more extractive industry. Degrowth now. |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
B>B Personal answerIncrease |
Transportation › Public Transportation
B>B Personal answerYes |
Science › Lab Grown Meat
B>B Personal answerWhat a bizarrely worded question. |
Transportation › Green Transportation
B>B Personal answerYes all public buses and trains. Private ones too. Ban personal vehicles while you're at it. |
Transportation › Fuel Efficiency Requirements
B>B Personal answerYes. As close to 100% efficiency as possible. That means on the production side too. Stop making cars. |
National Security › National Identification System
B>B Personal answerNo |
Education › Charter Schools
B>B Personal answerWhat does this even mean? Independent from what? Curricula? Misinformation? Fossil capital? Religious doctrine and censure? |
National Security › Backdoor Access to Encrypted Communications
B>B Personal answerThat's not how encryption works. |
National Security › Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Defense
B>B Personal answerDefense against what? For that matter, how could an unthinking blender that we all know is incapable of parsing and rephrasing, let alone synthesizing information do anything but hurt people? This is a nonsense question. |
Technology › Social Media Regulation
B>B Personal answerYes |
Technology › Cryptocurrencies
B>B Personal answerMoney is fake |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH submitted…2wks2W
▲ 469 replies
@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y
▲ 3991 reply3 agree5 disagree
@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y
▲ 7710 replies2 agree6 disagree
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
