Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
9>9 Personal answerPro-choice, I don’t agree but the government has no right to ban it |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gay Marriage
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Taxes
9>9 Personal answerNo, but lower taxes for the poor |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
9>9 Personal answerDepending on how serious, and assured just trial of individual |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
9>9 Personal answerNo, this will encourage people not to work and harm economic growth |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
9>9 Personal answerIndividualized government and expert developed rates should be made to tax a corporation based on economic performance, contribution, and general supply and demand of a corporation within it's sector. |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only by closing the gun show loophole |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
9>9 Personal answerMore |
Immigration › Immigration
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Education › Student Loan Debt
9>9 Personal answerNo, but reduce interest rates |
the Economy › Universal Child Care
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only for low income families |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
9>9 Personal answerYes when economically feasible |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
9>9 Personal answerYes, for most but not all drugs |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
9>9 Personal answerNot untill rehabilitation effort programs are underfunded. Once rehabilitaion programs are strong it should then be encouraged and help for addicts should be implemented as a part of the safe havens |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
9>9 Personal answerNo, implement foreign buyer and vacancy taxes instead |
Crime › Parole Hearings
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only after living in the country for 10 years |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
9>9 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo it should instead be redirected to funding increased reliability (better mental health response, and ethical decisons based on various spectrums of social preassures) of police and alongside the increase in funding a increase in responsibility and liability be placed on police in instances of malpractice |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only in response to extreme situations |
the Economy › Government Spending
9>9 Personal answerYes cuts should be made but with a coherent & sustainible plans to support public persons effected by cuts. |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
9>9 Personal answerYes, any citizen that pays taxes should be allowed to vote |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
9>9 Personal answerDecrease |
Science › Nuclear Energy
9>9 Personal answerNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
Education › Postsecondary Education
9>9 Personal answerProvincially managed but with federal standards to ensure consistency |
Transportation › Public Transportation
9>9 Personal answerNo, we have more important issues that need funding |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
9>9 Personal answerIncrease, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
9>9 Personal answerNo, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability |
Transportation › Green Transportation
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Education › Charter Schools
9>9 Personal answerYes, but not at the expense of funding public schools |
Transportation › Commercial Drones
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
▲ 6.4k122 replies
@ISIDEWITH asked…6 days6D
▲ 7841.8k replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
