@92M8FFH

9>9  Personal answerPro-life personally, but I believe that it should be someones choice regardless of my own personal beliefs. I have literally no reason/right to tell someone who is pregnant what to do on this matter.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerLast I checked that was legal as of 2005 with the passing of the federal Civil Marriage Act which made same sex marriage legal across the country. Answer regards is yes, since it already is a thing.

9>9  Personal answerIncrease corporate taxes by a modest amount, reduce on lower brackets, increase by a modest amount on the rich and close loopholes for the rich and corporations to hide money made in the country outside the country.

9>9  Personal answerYes, make it a living wage. A trio of economists one of which is Canadian debunked the whole theory around around prices always jumping accordingly. Living wage should be eligible to 18+ workers. Saying it's only meant to develop experience punishes anyone who cannot afford to go to post secondary after high school due to various reasons.

9>9  Personal answerIf they haven't received citizenship they yes provided the country of origin isn't in turmoil or unsafe. Doing so would be equivalent to a death sentence. If they have received citizenship then no, they should serve their time like ALL Canadians who commit a serious crime would.

9>9  Personal answerNo, since the majority of the crimes we are seeing are not tied back to legally acquired firearms. Case and point, the tragedy in Nova Scotia. Most recent report into how the gunman got the fire arms was through a friend smuggling them in through the states when he didn't have a PAL. We should be looking into cracking down on flow of illegal firearms into Canada first before we look at changing purchasing rules. The recent gun violence we are seeing can also be viewed as a symptom of larger societal problems that simply changing restrictions on the purchasing of firearms won't address and will windup delaying an effective solution.

9>9  Personal answerLess, and provide more government funding

9>9  Personal answerNo, need to expand out of country credentials and what is accepted so we can address key labour shortages. Doctors are a good example.

9>9  Personal answerYes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

9>9  Personal answerProvincial, but with federal funding and regulated standards

9>9  Personal answerNo, Banning on religion is stupid. Should be increased screening from high risk countries but other than that no.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerNo, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a major crime. Don't care if they are being looked into for say minor things like speeding. Major crimes like sexual assault however should be grounds for immediate disqualification.

9>9  Personal answerThat's complicated. Depends on the drug so it would need to be on a case by case basis. This conversation should also be part of a larger one around introducing safe consumption sites to help reduce the strain on Canada's health care system (specifically ER rooms) since an ER visit is exponentially more expensive then running the safe consumption site. Increasing funding for Mental Health also needs to be part of this conversation to help increase access of a desperately needed service nation wide. Federal government should work with the provinces to deal with this so the response is more universal instead of patchwork across the country.

9>9  Personal answerClarity on use of term foreigner is needed. If we're talking about immigrants who are either here on a green card or have just obtained citizenship then no, they should be allowed to buy property and a program to deal with homes purchased by someone with a green card could help prevent homes from being held by someone out of country in the event they don't get a renewal for their green card or don't get citizenship. If we are referring to a person or corporation that is based outside of the country who has no intentions of using it then it should be an outright ban vs temporary one.

9>9  Personal answerShould be a combination of repairing per-existing as well adding new to help limit urban sprawl. Any net new added should be apartment/condo to use new space as efficiently as possible. If the building being repaired falls into the abandoned or condemned category it should be repaired and turned into low income housing to help combat homelessness.

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNo, but increase tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products

9>9  Personal answerLocal and provincial yes, Federal after being in the country for 4 years.

9>9  Personal answerSubsidize up to a certain percent on a house based off persons income and value of house, as well as prevent the number of residential properties that can be purchased by a single person or corporation (for traditional homes). With regards to condo's and apartments a person or corporation can own multiple but a limit must be put on how many are allowed to be used for short term rent applications/programs like AirBNB. Abandoned&condemned properties should be purchased by the provincial or federal government and turned into low income housing to help combat homelessness.

9>9  Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment

9>9  Personal answerYes, a group should be created to respond specifically to non-violent calls who have special training to handle these events. This allows officers to be utilized more effectively. This would also need to be create in tandem with increased mental health supports.

9>9  Personal answerNo

9>9  Personal answerNo, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerIncrease

9>9  Personal answerShould have funding (combined should equal about 60%) from both federal and provincial to ensure standards and maintain diverse programs to prevent corporate funding being high enough to dictate what a post secondary school can teach

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerIn its current state, no. Need to address scope, and oversight. Once that is done then I might support it depending on if changes introduce different problems or not.

9>9  Personal answerYes, we should look to hydrogen cells after the successful pilot that was done in Alberta with Semi's running between Edmonton and Calgary and use this as a way to address fuel for buses. Should look into expanding rail systems and potentially leverage hydrogen to generate the electricity since the by product from this is water. You can then use that water after running it through a remineralizing process. This water can then be allocated to help farmers in areas of the country that are going through drought or drought like conditions to help reduce strain on local water supplies.

9>9  Personal answerLeave as it since I'm sure about 90% don't know how Canada's senate works and I'm pretty sure at least half of that group think it acts similarly to the US Senate.

9>9  Personal answerYes

9>9  Personal answerYes so long as they stay out of residential areas.