Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Domestic Policy › Government Surveillance
3>3 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Prescription Drugs
3>3 Personal answerI think those that have existing neonatal conditions should get compensated/coverage for prescription drugs that are required for daily living. However for those who have healthcare plans, or no coverage there still should be regulations to cap the costs. |
Education › University Tuition
3>3 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Dental Coverage
3>3 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
3>3 Personal answerRaise |
the Environment › Logging
3>3 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
3>3 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigration
3>3 Personal answerYes |
Social › Niqāb
3>3 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Universal Child Care
3>3 Personal answerThey should for those who have children who need specialized care due to disability; and those who are deemed middle class/low income only. |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
3>3 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
3>3 Personal answerNo, instead of monetary funds, we should instead offer assistance in the form of education, training, and social programs |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
3>3 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Keystone Pipeline
3>3 Personal answerYes, the pipeline is necessary for the economic future of Canada |
Elections › Electoral Reform
3>3 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Pension Tax
3>3 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Parole Hearings
3>3 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Northern Gateway Pipeline
3>3 Personal answerI would support it if the benefits that the Gas/Oil company receive is passed on to the consumers, the pipeline benefits our economy and the appropriate of lands is done fairly. |
Domestic Policy › Commuter Rail
3>3 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Campaign Finance
3>3 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
3>3 Personal answerYes, but in the form of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession |
Elections › Prime Minister Term Limits
3>3 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Free Trade
3>3 Personal answerWe need to ensure the human rights policies with the countries we enact pacts with and ensure that our resources and labours are protected. |
Domestic Policy › Quebec Sovereignty
3>3 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Temporary Foreign Workers
3>3 Personal answerNeither, maintain the current amount |
Domestic Policy › Worker Strikes
3>3 Personal answerYes they should when federal government tries to balance their budgets by negotiating cuts to these sectors but doesn't cut their own resources (e.g. MP's salaries, expense reports etc) |
the Economy › Old Age Pensions
3>3 Personal answerI believe it should be increased for those who have contributed. Not increased for those who have lived on welfare or other government programs. |
Domestic Policy › National Daycare
3>3 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Energy Sector
3>3 Personal answerPrivatize, but increase environmental and regulatory oversight for price control |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
3>3 Personal answerDecrease |
Education › Postsecondary Education
3>3 Personal answerProvincially managed but with federal standards to ensure consistency |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
3>3 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Senate
3>3 Personal answerLeave as is |
the Economy › Employment Insurance
3>3 Personal answerYes, if they pay into it |
the Economy › Income Splitting
3>3 Personal answerNo, income splitting is unfair to low income families |
the Economy › Pension Premiums
3>3 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Long Form Census
3>3 Personal answerYes, the information is vital for economists, scientists, statisticians, and the government to accurately make important policy decisions |
Domestic Policy › Copyright
3>3 Personal answerLet the free market, instead of the government, decide |
Transportation › Commercial Drones
3>3 Personal answerWith the current privacy act in Canada, I believe that there needs to be some regulations on drones. Like aircraft all units should have an Identification number visible and be registered with the CTSB providing details of usage. This will protect the citizens from privacy invasion as well as our country from spies, or other foreign intelligence. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH submitted…1wk1W
▲ 86 replies1 agree
@ISIDEWITH asked…5 days5D
▲ 7141.6k replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
