Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
8>8 Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
8>8 Personal answerI'm fine with how it works now. |
Social › Gay Marriage
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Identity
8>8 Personal answerI don't really care |
the Economy › Taxes
8>8 Personal answerYes - but I would say to gradually increase taxes on the rich and lower them for the poor. For example, every year, taxes for corporations could increase .2-4% or remove a few tax loopholes. |
Education › University Tuition
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
8>8 Personal answerNo, only if they have entered the country illegally |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
8>8 Personal answerRegardless, minimum wage standards should be adjusted by age group |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
8>8 Personal answerNo, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
8>8 Personal answerI am satisfied with the current system |
Immigration › Immigration
8>8 Personal answerI think we should make the process easier for skilled workers, but also for immigrants who came from severe situations like escaping war or poverty and are looking for a place to settle down and straighten out their lives. |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
8>8 Personal answerIt's sort of like how I answered in a previous question: yes, but incrementally to not cause anger or riot. |
Education › Student Loan Debt
8>8 Personal answerNo, but reduce interest rates |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
8>8 Personal answerI think yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence and have been approved by both a psychologist and fellow politicians. |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
8>8 Personal answerNo, but I don't agree how the current funds are currently being allocated. |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
8>8 Personal answerThey should implement the concept into our society, but slowly ease it doesn't feel like drug users are being pressured to use it and ending up with it being useless. |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
8>8 Personal answerNo, implement foreign buyer and vacancy taxes instead |
Crime › Parole Hearings
8>8 Personal answerSort of a combination of answers 3 and 4. I think they should be psychologically evaluated, but we might as well help them get to that goal. |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only after living in the country for 5 years |
Housing › Affordable Housing
8>8 Personal answerNo, rebuild or repair existing houses instead |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
8>8 Personal answerNo, increase consumer incentives to recycle these products instead |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Spending
8>8 Personal answerDepends what they're cutting. If it's something like social services, then I would disagree as I find it would only help our economy. I would think that maybe reducing a public spending topic like Art could provide some use. |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
8>8 Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
Science › Nuclear Energy
8>8 Personal answerYes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives |
Education › Postsecondary Education
8>8 Personal answerProvincially managed but with federal standards to ensure consistency |
Transportation › Public Transportation
8>8 Personal answerI'm fine what's going on now, it's just that governments should do a better job of enforcing payment for the transit instead of increasing or decreasing spending. |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
8>8 Personal answerNeither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Green Transportation
8>8 Personal answerNo, we have more important issues that need funding right now |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…2wks2W
▲ 1.2k2.8k replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
