@8Z6P9KQ

8>8  Personal answerPro-choice, with regulations. 1-3 free abortions, depending on the situations, then at their cost after that (abstinence, contraceptions, and father-custody/adoption agencies exist). If a pregnancy is known, the father should be informed, and allowed to make a case for either a proper birth/cesarean or an in-vitro option. Childbirth is a mother’s choice. Parenthood involves both partners.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes, to a reasonable degree. Rich people aren’t some enemy to target, and shouldn’t be treated like one. Perhaps a new “rich” tax should be implemented and voted upon by both the rich/poor, to best decide how to utilize those new funds (subsidized housing, groceries, necessities, etc.)

8>8  Personal answerEach province should have 2 main places of secondary-learning: a no-cost place with extremely basic amenities, and a privately funded location. The No-cost institute should get a percentage of the provincial budget, the amount voted upon by said provincial populace, and re-adjusted on a regular basis.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes? No? Every town/city/province should do a study to find out how much it cost yearly to survive in that location, and base the minimum wage on the means, medians, and modes per location.

8>8  Personal answerEither there should be a regular mental check up for all firearm owners (legal or not, if possible. Monetary incentives to coerce unlawful to participate?), or a town armoury where all firearms can be stored/checked out? Alterations to this idea seem likely and beneficial.

8>8  Personal answerYes, if they cannot serve their sentence/cannot be rehabilitated, so long as it’s safe to return to their country. No, so long as they can serve their sentence fully, or can be sufficiently rehabilitated.

8>8  Personal answerIt should be decided on a per-business model, though I’m all for supporting greener businesses, alternative/renewable energies, and environmental preservation.

8>8  Personal answerI’m currently satisfied with the current system, though I wouldn’t mind a hybridized or split system (one privatized, one publicly funded to see what works, what doesn’t.)

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerEvery student in debt should have SOME opportunity to recoup some losses. If we can find enough in the budget for a lump sum, great. If not, students should still be able to contact someone and get some other kind of relief: receiving textbooks in high-demand fields, a set-time living somewhere rent-free, food/bills/amenities, some tuition relief for a career change. This would only apply to each student once, maybe twice depending on circumstances, to prevent another potential drain on funds by parasitic citizens or students with little-to-no drive or plans.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerAll aboriginals, relatives, and all involved should meet, discuss a 1-time reparations fee, and implement either a lump sum or payment plan so as to do away with this issue, since it’s causing more harm and hatred then it’s causing good.

8>8  Personal answerDrugs should be studied and legalized/restricted per province/country as they’ve been so far. There should also be a location with specialized rooms for harder drug use, staffed with security, medics, and people trained to help keep delusional people grounded, so long as the drug users pay some upkeep fee and sign a waiver stating they know the potential risks involved, along with a donation box for a related treatment centre.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes, if the crime they committed (or commit while campaigning/in-office) doesn’t seriously affect their judgment and decisions, and they try their best at maintaining their duties.

8>8  Personal answerNo, so long as they fully intend to reside there, or plan to live there permanently in the future. Yes, if they’re just trying to become a land owner for profit, or they plan to hand over the land to foreign powers.

8>8  Personal answerNo, increase consumer incentives to recycle these products instead

8>8  Personal answerYes, but we should TRY to keep farmland and green space. We should see if any contractors/corporations would be willing to rebuild/repair existing houses (maybe at cost), or if people would volunteer their efforts/manpower towards this endeavour as well, in their local communities.

8>8  Personal answerYes, and we should provide more rehabilitation programs for prisoners

8>8  Personal answerYes, if they have serious intent to permanently and legally reside in Canada.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerYes, though if a homeowner starts to see significant profits after paying off their mortgage, there should be an office in the government that they can make donations to as thanks for the support, or that they can vote to receive a portion from tax/treasury for future homeowner subsidies.

8>8  Personal answerYes/maybe, for local police. If citizens want a police force they can trust, they should also be the ones funding that police force. RCMP and crown/privatized security, no. RCMP I believe are loyal to the crown/government, and private security is usually just for profit.

8>8  Personal answerYes, so long as the voter has a decent understanding of each political party, knows which party they support/oppose, and know the ramifications of voting and not voting.

8>8  Personal answerYes, or No, if we get an unbiased individual/group (likely someone foreign to Canada, along with a learned private citizen and a government official) to investigate the leading cause of the national debt, along with who’s a bigger influence - private citizens or government bureaucracies/policies.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerWe should lower this budget, at first, until we can eliminate certain unnecessary plagues over our home soil. Once poverty, (non-parasitical) homelessness, racial/unprovoked hostility is lowered or non-existent, more funds can be distributed to foreign aid.

8>8  Personal answerI feel provinces should try out a two-institution model: A zero-cost institution of volunteers/fresh instructors, paid-by-provincial-taxes and a privatized institution, so each province can see which model works better for them.

8>8  Personal answerYes, if the government spends more than 50% of their travel time using public transportation. No, if they use mostly (their own) vehicle/s.

8>8  Personal answerYes, if local police and intelligence agencies are fully committed to protecting the Canadian populace over the Crown/privatized factions. If police can be strong armed by higher-ups or sponsors, or if they can be bought out, then they can become a liability to the people they were previously sworn to protect.

8>8  Personal answerI’m neutral on this one, but I’m all for increasing it if it directly benefits our troops/forces and overseas missions/assets, so long as those contributing (tax payers) can get a rough list of purchases, and certain civilians can get a more in-depth look at Canadian military efforts (current standard issues, mission goals, tech demonstrations, etc.)

8>8  Personal answerYes, if it’s economically and ecologically viable, with encouragement towards making greener/more-profitable advancements and alternatives/alterations. No, if we’re unprepared to meet the requirements of an all-electric public transport model.

8>8  Personal answerYes