@8CX4TNN

8>8  Personal answerNo murder. Whichever answer results with no murder.

8>8  Personal answerYes, as long as this can be afforded without much issue. If there is issue, I guess as long as this issue (these issues) can be worked around or handled, then my answer would still be yes.

8>8  Personal answerYes, they should have the same adoption rights as straight couples, and if anything, should have more right to adopt, since same gender couples cannot have their own children without adoption, so if they want children, or just a child, they have to adopt, so they should have the same adoption rights, if not greater adoption rights.

8>8  Personal answerYes, but only for low income families

8>8  Personal answerSure, why not? This can be legal. I see no reason as to why it should be illegal. If they are truly in love, then I say let it be (They can marry)!

8>8  Personal answerOn the one hand, I want to say yes, since the Canadian Government(s) could probably milk more money out of the rich, and hence gain more money to use on other important things, but on the other, I want to say no since this is kind of cruel and unusual punishment to people that just happen to have more money than others. I mean you should not be punished for having lots of money, you should not have to lose more because you have more, and being rich does not seem like the kind of thing that should be a bit risk/reward-y, I mean you have more money, but you also have to lose more. It just does not sound right, or fair, so I think I will say no just because of how unfair that sounds to the rich.

8>8  Personal answerWhatever the way it is right now, I am satisfied with. (So probably no.)

8>8  Personal answerNo, I am satisfied with the current federal minimum wage.

8>8  Personal answerYes, in addition to the currently existing ones, there should be restrictions that thoroughly check your background, for things like crimes, records of "craziness", and etc., and have you go for tests to determine if you have any traits that fall under "craziness that induces a shooting", or for any signs that you are mentally ill or psychologically crazy, which would indicate that you should not be trusted with a gun. These restrictions should be added to the already existing ones.

8>8  Personal answerNo, they should just be locked up in a Canadian jail. They should just have to endure the normal consequence for us Canadians having dealt a serious crime, not being forced to move just because they did not start here.

8>8  Personal answerYes, we have to do what we can make the current effects of climate change, pollution, and/or global warming less worse on our world, and if that involves increasing environmental regulations on businesses to reduce carbon emissions, then so be it!

8>8  Personal answerI am satisfied with the current system

8>8  Personal answerNo, the current policy seems to work just fine, at least to me. I mean, I do not think anything terrible has happened as a result of immigration to Canada, not yet at least.

8>8  Personal answerWell, if we cannot get a background check on these immigrants before letting them in to ensure they will not do terrorism, then yes, they should be banned until the government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists, just to lower the chances of a terrorist attack.

8>8  Personal answerYes, this is very important, for many reasons, such as the current energy crisis, pollution, and more. I would go into more detail, but I just did that for a recent school assignment, and I do not exactly want to repeat everything again. But yes, the federal government should financially support the production and consumption of renewable energy sources, since it is a very important issue right now, we need to improve or solve the case of the energy crisis, and we need to use more sources of energy that do not pollute, like most non-renewables do.

8>8  Personal answerYes, Canadian aboriginals should receive more government funds, since they have been done dirty, very much at that, and seeing just how badly the Canadian aboriginals have been treated, they should be given more funds from the government in attempt to slightly repay them for what we made them go through.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerNo, drugs should only be used if prescribed to a person by a medical professional. Otherwise, drugs should not be decriminalized (the illegal ones at least).

8>8  Personal answerNo, but that kind of depends on the crime, and how long ago it had been done.

8>8  Personal answerNo, but people should learn how to dispose of them properly, or at least should actually do it. I do not want to see plastic cups, water bottles, and other plastic stuff lying around where it should not. Please, people, dispose of your plastic, do not litter! Maybe if this keeps up for too long and too drastically, maybe it should be banned, but the way things are now, I think just disposing of this material properly is the best solution.

8>8  Personal answerNo, people who have committed first degree murder are not publicly safe, or any level of safe, and for that matter are probably not mentally stable either, and would likely commit another crime (probably murder) as soon as they get any chance to come in contact with the outside world, and their insanity would probably only have been increased due to their many years in stony lonesome, thus reinforcing their desire to murder, or just commit another crime. Therefore, no parole ever for first degree murderers, in my opinion at least.

8>8  Personal answerYes, everyone should have the right to vote, even if you do not exactly belong to the country you are voting in/for. To be honest though, why would a foreigner care about what we Canadians vote for?

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerNo, I think that the current minimum voting age is mostly reasonable. It works.

8>8  Personal answerNo, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy

8>8  Personal answerI mean, in terms of non-renewables, it happens to be the most clean one out there. On the other hand, it is also one of the most unsafe and unstable, and if seriously not handled well, can result in radiation that can last upon decades, maybe even centuries! If we are to continue using non-renewables more than renewables, then yes, I support the use of nuclear energy, since it is clean, but otherwise, no, I do not support it, as it can be really dangerous, and I just think we should try to move on to renewables.

8>8  Personal answerYes, and the tax should be at least 10%

8>8  Personal answerProvincial

8>8  Personal answerNo, the spending that currently is works just fine, and well for that matter.

8>8  Personal answerNo, just because the goal of Bill C-51 seems a bit vague and unspecific to the consequences. I mean, I do like how this aims to prevent terrorism, but the rest seems a bit, well vague and unspecific, to get my support. Plus, I just learned about right now.

8>8  Personal answerYes, everyone deserves to vote, no matter what crimes you have committed. (Besides, any vote is just 1 vote. What damage could a criminal's vote even do?)

8>8  Personal answerI suppose if the jail is on the verge of overcrowding, then non-violent prisoners could be released with some sort of parole or community service, but not fully released, just done so with limitations in place to prevent them from being fully free until they can officially be free and released.

8>8  Personal answerYes

8>8  Personal answerAs long as the drones are being used in a well controlled manner, not to do illegal business, and of course, commercially, then yes, the government should permit the use of drones for commercial purposes.