Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
9>9 Personal answerPro life, but if the woman provides a valid reason, (rape, incest, danger to mother or child or some other legitimate reason) I don't view abortion as a method of birth control. If a woman is too young, she should be allowed to have an abortion, but yes, I believe there should be a penalty if a second abortion is requested because the person is irresponsible. |
Healthcare › Prescription Drugs
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Transition
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
9>9 Personal answerRemain the Same. |
Social › Gay Marriage
9>9 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Taxes
9>9 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
9>9 Personal answerThe minimum wage should be appropriate for a set standard of living and should be adjusted according to inflation. |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
9>9 Personal answerMinor crimes should only have jail time. Major crimes permit the offender to be deported, but only if their home country is safe to return to, otherwise they will face extra jail time, and possibly large amounts of community service and bans on certain permits (access to certain areas, restraining orders, etc.). |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
9>9 Personal answerRequire the background checks, psychological testing, training, but also pass a national "stand your ground" and conceal carry laws with less restrictions. If they already passed these tests, location restrictions don't make sense especially since they are usually high value targets. |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
9>9 Personal answerPrivate healthcare should definitely be an option as well. This will make healthcare more accessible and allow more freedom to choose between the publicly-funded option and market alternatives. |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigration
9>9 Personal answerNeutral. We should improve the vetting procedures to ensure we are letting in safe people, but also make it far easier for skilled immigrants to get easy access into Canada. |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Education › Student Loan Debt
9>9 Personal answerNot incredibly educated in this field. The government needs to add financials as a core subject in schools. |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
9>9 Personal answerdepends how long ago and how serious the crime |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
9>9 Personal answerNo, implement foreign buyer and vacancy taxes instead |
Housing › Affordable Housing
9>9 Personal answerNo, rebuild or repair existing houses instead |
Crime › Parole Hearings
9>9 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
9>9 Personal answerYes, but not until making environmentally-friendly alternatives that exist at the same (or lower) price, and use government regulation or intervention to get companies to that right now. Until then, this just seems to discriminate against people like those with disabilities and working class people who can't afford to or don't have the time or energy to wash dishes every day, and disposable alternatives are currently helpful to those people even if they recognize the environmental impact. An outright ban on regular people without taking action against the companies responsible for the current options is just misguided and directs anger at the wrong targets. |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only after living in the country for 5 years |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
9>9 Personal answerSubsidize home buyers who make less than $45k |
Elections › Prime Minister Term Limits
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, though it should be used in extreme situations and with fairly strict training on how and when to use said military equipment. |
Crime › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerFunding needs to be based on the area. Funding also needs to be assigned to social and community programs to help reduce crime and in turn can lead reduced spending foe the police |
the Economy › Government Spending
9>9 Personal answerAdjust based on situation |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
9>9 Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
Science › Nuclear Energy
9>9 Personal answerConsidering the current state of nuclear energy, no. We should push our research investments towards nuclear fusion. In contrast with nuclear fission, which is the main source of nuclear energy around the globe, it could potentially be the most effective and healthy source of energy in the world, without any downsides. Cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium and geothermal should also be considered as great bridges towards diminishing CO2 emissions. |
Education › Postsecondary Education
9>9 Personal answerProvincial |
Transportation › Public Transportation
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
9>9 Personal answerNeither, They should only increase the military spending when it necessary. |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Green Transportation
9>9 Personal answerNo, not all, just focus on infrastructure that is easy and cost-effective to replace |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answerNo, but political advertising on social media should be regulated |
Education › Charter Schools
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as they aren't given subsidies and follow the basic curriculum. |
Transportation › Commercial Drones
9>9 Personal answerDepends on application, survey , security, permitted activities..ex. Movie making , conservation surveys , land use monitoring, policing activities, monitoring agricultural practices, fishing practices (especially foreign commercial fishing factory vessels, that appear to rape the coastal fisheries)...multiple other apps .. not acceptable useage is light delivery of mail/parcels/advertising |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH submitted…5 days5D
▲ 86 replies1 agree
@ISIDEWITH asked…3 days3D
▲ 395903 replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
