Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
8>8 Personal answerPro-choice, I believe it is the woman's choice, and the pro-life argument, although reasonable to an extent, there is not enough support for the mother or the child currently for pro-life to be considered. |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
8>8 Personal answerYes, but make it so certain things currently excluded for everyone in a federal system has access, examples being dental care, physical therapy, etc. |
Social › Gay Marriage
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Taxes
8>8 Personal answerLower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations |
Healthcare › Dental Coverage
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
8>8 Personal answerYes and no, the minimum wage should be a 'livable wage' (i.e., relatively poor but able to get along) which I believe the current $15/hr coming into effect will achieve. |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
8>8 Personal answerNo, but close loopholes being able to bring guns into the country |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
8>8 Personal answerMore, keep current public system but make room for a non-subsidized private system (absolutely 0 government funding other than potentially for strictly research), which can relieve pressure on the public system and provide those with the means to 'skip the line' should they be able to afford it. |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
8>8 Personal answerYes, but root regulations with actual science, instead of seemingly random numbers to hit pre-determined targets without understanding the industries. Canada is currently one of if not the most regulated carbon markets in the world, but our own country treats it as if we are one of the worst. |
Immigration › Immigration
8>8 Personal answerNo, the current policy is sufficient |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
Education › Student Loan Debt
8>8 Personal answerNo, but significantly reduce the interest rate and increase the grace period of student loans. If the government forgives student loans, they should also give those that were responsible enough to either pay them off, or work during their post-secondary education to pay for their studies $20,000 as well. This is not fair to those that were responsible during their early adult years. |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
8>8 Personal answerYes, by offering private citizens (e.g., homeowners) and businesses to be able to produce renewable energy at a similar cost to current energy prices. |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
8>8 Personal answerNo, instead of monetary funds, we should instead offer assistance in the form of education, training, and social programs |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
8>8 Personal answerYes, for drugs that have relatively low negative outcomes in comparison to currently legal drugs such as alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana. |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
8>8 Personal answerNo, rather significantly increase the requirements for foreign buyers, 20% additional tax, any capital gains on foreign bought land/property is, for example, taxed at 70%. |
Housing › Affordable Housing
8>8 Personal answerYes, relatively affordable homes/townhomes for the lower middle class (200-500k in large urban areas, 100-300k or less in smaller towns, cities, etc.) |
Crime › Parole Hearings
8>8 Personal answerNo, and reinstate the death penalty for heinous premeditated crimes |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
8>8 Personal answerNo, but increase taxes for creating non-biodegradable plastics slowly and increase biodegradable product tax incentives to phase them out as much as possible. |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only after living in the country for 5 years |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
8>8 Personal answerYes, and the government should limit the number of homes that can be bought by a single person or corporation |
Crime › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo, raise funding for social and community based programs, and re-organize police funding so more training and the culture of 'don't report your fellow officer' is minimized. |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Spending
8>8 Personal answerYes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials |
Science › Nuclear Energy
8>8 Personal answerYes, although relatively expensive, it is a perfect and reliable replacement for fossil fuel derived electricity which could accelerate the transition away from fossil fuel energy. Regulations and red tape need to be revised. |
Education › Postsecondary Education
8>8 Personal answerProvincially managed but with federal standards to ensure consistency |
Transportation › Public Transportation
8>8 Personal answerYes but depending on the city, some require major additional support, some not as much. But a well functioning and efficient public transportation system can significantly reduce the reliance on fossil fuel car usage in cities. |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
8>8 Personal answerNo, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation |
Transportation › Green Transportation
8>8 Personal answerNo, not all areas can be easily switched to electric power, particularly more remote areas. Slowly switching areas that are viable to electric power should be considered. |
Education › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if they are non-profit |
Transportation › Commercial Drones
8>8 Personal answerYes, considering safety measures and regulations are being followed and enforced. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH submitted…5 days5D
▲ 86 replies1 agree
@ISIDEWITH asked…3 days3D
▲ 339775 replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
