Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
8>8 Personal answerPro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
8>8 Personal answerAs long as they caring and loving parents who cares. I don’t agree with it same sex marriage based on my upbringing but bible is clear on this stuff. Stay out of it and let God judge them in the end. As long as no one is hurting or harming kids |
Social › Gay Marriage
8>8 Personal answerShouldn’t be of the governments concern. Bible says no but let people do what they will. If it is a matter of security or life and death of Canadian citizens then it’s a government issue. This isn’t not shouldn’t be of governments concern. If a church wants or doesn’t want to marry same sex people it’s their choice. Let the people choose. Or they can find somewhere else to get married…. Just stay out of it. |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
8>8 Personal answerUmm let me think….. we are just going through a pandemic that swept the entire world off its feet… I’m gonna go with a YES on this one. Make ours the best in the world. Again… privatize, work with the companies and all handouts must be paid back in a reasonable amount of time. No free bees to these companies or forgiveable loans but interest free loans amortized out over certain period of time so they are profitable and creating jobs and providing a top notch service to the health care industry. |
the Economy › Taxes
8>8 Personal answerPick up a book and read “Rich Dad, Poor Dad” by Robert Kiyosaki. Then answer this question for yourself. Your only hurting the poor raising taxes on the rich!!! Idiots. But it’s good propaganda to get the poor to vote one way or another and or raise a stink about something like protesting whatever which in turn just hurts themselves…we need a more educated society, we need financial education like rich dad poor dad in ALL schools. We would have a very very rich nation in the next generation. |
Education › University Tuition
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
8>8 Personal answerRegulations yes. A carbon charge to all… hell no…. Where is my tax dollars really going? |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
8>8 Personal answerMore |
Immigration › Immigration
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
8>8 Personal answerYes. Here is something that’s is bull shit for lack of a better term…. You spend $50,000 on solar. Whatever energy you don’t use Saskpower takes back after so long however they don’t pay us who is creating it for it at the same rate they charge…. Notice how government, crown corporations are a one way street. Hell we own it. What it charges for power it should pay back!! It’s the same power, different source. It comes from someone doing what governments “want”. Or maybe they just want what’s profitable for “then”. Not their citizens. You know…. The people they are elected to govern for… problem is governments aren’t about governing any longer. It’s all about greed and money. People have lost there way… you can have a rich, energy efficient, carbon neutral nation if you just get your head out of your a$$ and make some very simple decisions on energy. You are not fooling anyone! |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
8>8 Personal answerThey have every possible chance to flourish in this nation and more. They don’t need more money. It only makes the problem worse and you damn well know it. Your imprisoning them ever longer and showing them a total lack of respect. They are perfectly capable human beings and just need to be educated in a certain way. Throw a rich dad poor dad book at them watch them flourish. Educate your people and yourselves in finance and you are soon to be very wealthy. Enough hand outs!!! |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
8>8 Personal answerAll plastics can be recycled. Start a programs based off of weight that incentivizes the public to recycle all plastics in a way that is profitable to all! |
Healthcare › Marijuana
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Parole Hearings
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Spending
8>8 Personal answerOnly way out of this hole is to work with private business giving interest free loans that must be paid back that create jobs which produce tax dollars which will slowly but surely get us out of the hole previous governments have got us in. Always balance the budget even when it hurts and influence companies to create jobs around the problems we are having. Incentives , interest free loans… must be paid back however, no handouts like bombardier. That’s disgusting. Me or any other small business don’t get away with millions. Nor should any other business. That’s not capitalism. In a capitalistic society everyone can be rich. But you gotta work for it and educate yourself to get there. But we all have a chance at it. If it is to be it’s up to me… it’s called coming from a place of being responsible. |
Science › Nuclear Energy
8>8 Personal answerHuge YES. We have the easiest, cleanest ability to do this in Canada and Saskatchewan in particular. Put on up in north central Saskatchewan. Close to the mines and perfect spot for a nuclear reactor with all the lakes.. it perfect. Nevermind the fact we can have and should have cheap and extremely efficient power for our nation. They are our resources!!! Here’s an idea…. Let’s use them!!! Or we can import gas from other countries!!! How efficient and green is that… stop making everything about money and greed and let’s focus on livability, efficiency, and keeping our environment clean. Nuclear is the answer. Bar none. We all know and we have the science to back it up! |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
8>8 Personal answerYes and the tax should be at least 5%. I would like to see the 5% in tax go towards helping Canadian citizens purchase their own homes and go towards helping landlords and/or companies in the residential rental business to help build new residential rental properties. Also I implement a plan to work with these landlords to work with Canadian citizens that are renting to help them purchase their own homes via an RTO (rent to own). We as landlords can helps the government and people as a whole in purchasing their own homes. The best way for this to happen is for private companies (landlords), the government, and the people who want to buy a home but can’t to all work together to achieve this collectively. A home owner is a happier citizen, and feels more secure, proud and is more productive. |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
8>8 Personal answerWe print our money from thin air… we can’t and never will balance a budget. Inflation is the only answer until the bombs go off…until you can balance your own budget and here is an idea…. Have a surplus!!! Then spend the surplus… I know this idea is far out there…. But it’s what we as business owners must do in order to survive…. Just our governments don’t have to… if there ever were a government that did that instead of the other way they would be so wealthy when shit hits the fan. Which is will soon because our monetary system is fiat…. |
Education › Postsecondary Education
8>8 Personal answerProvincial |
Transportation › Public Transportation
8>8 Personal answerNo and we should privatize more public transportation. Regulate it however to ensure the private companies are making it more environmentally friendly than that of the current infrastructure. This is something the government could help with. It’s government working with private companies that will solve our financial problems and create jobs. As long as the subsidies are manageable or interest free loans to help get projects up and going. But are paid back over a certain amortization period that can still keep the private company profitable so It can continue creating jobs while providing the services. |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
8>8 Personal answerYeah sure, but you better relax gun laws also. It is a slippery slope so as long as our citizens have right to bears arms and we know government can’t “police state” us then yeah. Law and order is important and absolutely has a place in Canada. |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation |
Education › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Commercial Drones
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
▲ 5.9k118 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…2wks2W
▲ 469 replies
@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y
▲ 7710 replies2 agree6 disagree
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
