Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
8>8 Personal answerPro-choice |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Mental Health Funding
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
8>8 Personal answerYes, and do not privatize any services |
Social › Gay Marriage
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Taxes
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Education › International Students
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
8>8 Personal answerYes, and ban all guns from public use |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
8>8 Personal answerLess |
Immigration › Immigration
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Education › Student Loan Debt
8>8 Personal answerThey should help Canadians that have been unable to pay their loans wether in good standing or not by forgiving the debt of those who weren't able to complete their training or schooling based on reasoning such as if private colleges are offering their students the proper teachings by teachers concerned about them succeeding or if they have a high drop out rate and if theyre teaching them using up to date relevant tools especially in a hands on training facility or environment and f the student has been given fair options when choosing a more fitting option above dropping out such as transfer to another facility in their authority. If the student was unable to complete their training due to unfair treatment , unaccomodating environments, or inadequate teachers and were not given the proper everday tools used in their potential Feild and when a request of transfer should not be refused but accommodated this is just one example of the possible stipulations that should be considered as grounds for debt forgiveness and the ones that should be deemed liable are the schools that allowed these things to be an issue. The person owing because they were unable to finish for whatever reason obviously won't be able to make the possible income they would have had they been successful in their training and gaining the employment they sought out to gain therefore they are unable to acquire the sufficient amount to pay back the debt without having to sacrifice some other aspect of their livelihood such as food or rent or utilities. Therefore they should definately be forgiven for student loan debt based on reasoning |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
8>8 Personal answerYes, for most but not all drugs |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Freshwater Research
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Parole Hearings
8>8 Personal answerYes depending on the crime reasoning and their psychological state and if they're deemed a further threat to society but determined by the most reputable long running psychologists under the strictest guidelines and the most in depth detailed psychological assessment that can be made including signs of minipulation deceitfulness or telling them what they want to hear to get what they want. |
Housing › Affordable Housing
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerAll available funding not being used for other important services needs not should be needs to be put to the use of government housing for low income residents that are currently homeless and are being chased around by the officials appointed to address the homeless living in tents this issue is not right and on that note there needs to be officials appointed to enforcing discrimination towards those on social assistance as it is not considered an actual income to most. And also there needs to be people appointed to helping people with bad credit get a place regardless fact is that landlord's shouldn't have authorization to our private financial information as they are not giving us any type of loan Infact we pay first and last before moving in if anything we are giving them a loan and we should be checking their credit history. Banning the use of our credit history is a must people's credit issues are the reason discrimination is an issue all discriminatory factors are hidden behind a person's credit issues and also housing should be given as a first come first serve basis the first to apply that fit the affordability criteria should be the approved candidate wether on social assistance or bad credit history. And just as important the price for housing needs to be capped at a reasonable affordability rate although there are people that can afford the rates most can't even on a 2 person income and the greed seems to be overcoming the humanity in people these days people don't care about people anymore it's sad and we need to do something about it because it's obvious that noone is going to do it themselves. And every extra dollar needs to be put where it will be most useful and beneficial since we have to now clean up the mess Trudeau has made by over populating our countries and towns providing housing and other benefits to newcomers over his own citizens he's literally forcing people into the streets and then not allowing them to do the only thing they can do live in tents it's sickening maybe we need to be m |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Small Business Funding
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Science › Nuclear Energy
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Education › Postsecondary Education
8>8 Personal answerBoth because in the end the people that succeed and gain employment pay both federal and provincial taxes so it should definately have a role in Post secondary education. |
Transportation › Public Transportation
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Green Transportation
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Transportation › Commercial Drones
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Aluminum Quotas
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
▲ 6.4k122 replies
@ISIDEWITH asked…7 days7D
▲ 8482k replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
