@3BC2FSD

3>3  Personal answerNo, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications, It is the citizens responsibility to protect the country in this case since the government cannot possibly handle everything and proper education provided on the subject in schools on a side note they are taught in a way that does not create future paranoia. Once a threat is flagged by citizens only then should authority intervene. Immigrants will have to be under surveillance for as long their education into citizenship is provided, and Immigrants with a history of violence or fraud will not be allowed into the country.

3>3  Personal answerNo, we cannot afford to add this at the moment

3>3  Personal answerYes, and the government should provide free university education

3>3  Personal answerYes

3>3  Personal answerIncrease for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses

3>3  Personal answerNo, preservation of our forests outweighs the economic benefits

3>3  Personal answerI Stated Guilty until proven Friend creates enemies AKA Offensive Position. Friend until proven Guilty creates A Friendly Position on all sides and quells chances of anything happening. In a previous vote on this list, However In this case It may seem like I contradict myself this time, but I am not since Immigrants come from different backgrounds there are some cultures that prefer a Guilty till friend standing. I believe strictly screening for any criminal background is required and if found they stay in their country. If not they go through a re-education process regardless of past education in their country, If you wish to be a citizen of Canada then learn to be a citizen of Canada, do not try to change Canada into your previous country, Otherwise your a tourist that needs to return home if you think you need to change it to your country. Changing Canada is up to Canadians no one else.

3>3  Personal answerProvide incentive but do not force it on businesses because it effects everyone. New businesses should have a requirement for alternative energies on startup and should get a kickback if they do decide on it and since they do not need to pay as much for running costs, they should lower their prices to their consumers or put money back towards their business under a five year term depending on the type of business (If they deal with consumers directly or not). The ones that do not decide to change have a limit of 5 years to get the funds for alternative energies or face closure. Small businesses are granted grandfather clause, all other old existing establishments have 5 to ten years to change to alternative energies or face being stripped down into a small business. Taxing businesses only prolongs the issue so going about it another way may resolve the issue.

3>3  Personal answerNo

3>3  Personal answerNo

3>3  Personal answerNo, instead of monetary funds, we should instead offer assistance in the form of education, training, and social programs

3>3  Personal answerNo, do not build anymore to do with mined fossil oils and get oil companies to consider the switch to grown farmed oils any mined fossil oils are increasingly becoming less necessary. Give tax kickbacks to the companies that make the switch.

3>3  Personal answerYes

3>3  Personal answerNo, They have likely worked to damn hard for it and should be given a break. Respect your elders.

3>3  Personal answerNo, do not build anymore to do with mined fossil oils and get oil companies to consider the switch to grown farmed oils any mined fossil oils are increasingly becoming less necessary. Give tax kickbacks to the companies that make the switch.

3>3  Personal answerProvided they are in stable condition and since they have to live with what they have done, they should have to go through a re-education and then only released into society with a social worker trained to deal with such cases. Along with release into certain sectors of society based on the case. The person will have social workers with them the rest of their lives if they want to be in society. Otherwise they join the army in a specialized regiment for such cases separate from other groups. They will serve and be trained as peace-keepers based on their case. Death Penalty is the last resort if they continue their old ways after both options are exhausted.

3>3  Personal answerAlternative Energy Trolley style systems should be invested in for rural and suburban areas to increase the economy in those areas and transportation services should be left to the private sector in urban to urban areas.

3>3  Personal answerDonations are gifts and not required and are nice gestures and should be nothing more than that but if used on the premise of gain or bribery should not be accepted by our government. Any donations given to the government directly should be used to boost public sectors and services nothing more. Anyone who works in government however cannot receive personal individual donations including lead roles such as prime minister and governor general. A donation to government should be a representation of a donation to everyone living in Canada.

3>3  Personal answerYes, but in the form of tax breaks for citizens and lowering of food and shelter costs. If you raise the bottom it raises the top of the structure and strengthens it. You are only as good as your weakest link after all.

3>3  Personal answerNo, free trade puts downward pressure on wages and undermines consumer and environmental protections

3>3  Personal answerNo, this will only create further problems and complications down the road and Canada does not need any more along with the rest of the world.

3>3  Personal answerYes, but only for low income families and single parents

3>3  Personal answerPrivatize, but increase environmental and regulatory oversight for price control

3>3  Personal answerWe should not give foreign aid to any countries if Military Reasons are involved.

3>3  Personal answerProvincially managed but with federal standards to ensure consistency

3>3  Personal answerNo, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability

3>3  Personal answerAbolish

3>3  Personal answerYes, but with limits set for workers with above average seasonal salaries

3>3  Personal answerRegardless, allow employees the option to opt-out of the CPP and invest in a private pension plan

3>3  Personal answerNo, I would prefer a mandatory short form with an optional long form census

3>3  Personal answerLet the free market, instead of the government, decide

3>3  Personal answerAs long as its used locally and not remotely (The only exception being delivery services which will also be restricted to certain radius and strict rules of conduct). A person must be using it in short distance radius to it's use so if there is any issues it can be dealt with. No commercial drone should be connected to the Internet at any time for any reason and should only be connected to a strict local pocket Network if needed.