Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Healthcare › Mental Health
B>B Personal answerYes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies |
Housing › Affordable Housing
B>B Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Prescription Drugs
B>B Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Mental Health Funding
B>B Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Healthcare Funding
B>B Personal answerYes |
Housing › Rent Control
B>B Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Dental Coverage
B>B Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
B>B Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
B>B Personal answerLess |
Healthcare › Healthcare
B>B Personal answerFederal |
Housing › First-time Homebuyer Subsidies
B>B Personal answerYes |
Technology › Data Privacy
B>B Personal answerYes |
Elections › Mental competency testing
B>B Personal answerYes |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
B>B Personal answerNo |
Elections › Campaign Finance
B>B Personal answerYes |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
B>B Personal answerNo, implement foreign buyer and vacancy taxes instead |
Housing › Green Spaces
B>B Personal answerYes |
Elections › Electoral Reform
B>B Personal answerYes |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
B>B Personal answerYes. Often they are disallowed at shelters because they will not give up pets or belongings. We need more understanding into their lives before we judge. |
Healthcare › Marijuana
B>B Personal answerYes |
Housing › Affordable Housing
B>B Personal answerYes, but not at the expense of farmland and green space |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
B>B Personal answerNo |
Housing › Homeless Shelters
B>B Personal answerYes |
Elections › Campaign Finance
B>B Personal answerYes, but limit the amount they can donate |
Elections › Prime Minister Term Limits
B>B Personal answerNo |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
B>B Personal answerNo |
Technology › Ethical Artificial Intelligence
B>B Personal answerYes |
Elections › Political Party Subsidies
B>B Personal answerNo |
Housing › High density residential buildings
B>B Personal answerNo |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
B>B Personal answerYes |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
B>B Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
B>B Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Medical Consensus
B>B Personal answerYes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive |
Housing › Foreclosure Assistance
B>B Personal answerNo |
Technology › Social Media Regulation
B>B Personal answerYes |
Technology › Cryptocurrencies
B>B Personal answerYes, the government should screen cryptocurrencies before circulation to ensure legitimate value and exchange rates |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH submitted…5 days5D
▲ 86 replies1 agree
@ISIDEWITH asked…4 days4D
▲ 419956 replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.