Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filter by tag

These are currently the most active tagged discussions.

Filter by author knowledge

Show discussions from authors that have these achievements:

Show discussions from expert pundits on:

Options

 @B4J3VX2from Ontario  answered…3hrs3H

I think current amount is fine as long as it’s to friendly allied countries. However not adding to deficit.

 @B4J3D6Jfrom Alberta  answered…4hrs4H

Yes, there is too much misinformation about nuclear energy; it is a safe and efficient source of energy with zero emissons.

 @B4J3D6Jfrom Alberta  answered…4hrs4H

As long as it is not private/public property and the arsonist has ownership of it then it doesn't matter.

 @B4J3D6Jfrom Alberta  answered…4hrs4H

The Canadian government should instead focus on large businesses within its own country instead: Bell, Rogers, Enmax, etc.

 @B4HZF6Dfrom Ontario  answered…6hrs6H

Yes if medications are needed to maintain their health and are expensive such as diabetes medications.

 @B4HZ9ZDfrom Alberta  answered…6hrs6H

For homeless disabled and low income but not at expense of green space. Build up not out, or revitalize.

 @B4HYM2Kfrom Nova Scotia  answered…7hrs7H

Government spending must be audited and held accountable for waste and overspending. Also need less beaurocrats

 @B4HXDJGfrom Nova Scotia  answered…9hrs9H

Yes to some extent but ensuring police receiving enough funding to be able to properly and safely do their jobs

 @B4HW7WYfrom Ontario  answered…10hrs10H

Non-residents shouldn’t be able to buy home in Canada. Only citizens or permanent residents should be able to buy home in Canada.

 @B4HW634from Ontario  answered…10hrs10H

We should make sure public transportation is done right the first time, and not have to spend in excess to fix it.

 @B4HVJNXfrom British Columbia  answered…10hrs10H

No, we should be moving toward abolishing the Indian Act, and negotiating self governance with each Nation. Appropriate compensation for each community once and…