Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Domestic Policy › Government Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerYes, this is necessary to combat terrorism |
Healthcare › Prescription Drugs
4>4 Personal answerNo. Most people that work are provided with some type of subsidy or 100% coverage through a company benefit plan. For individuals that have not contributed via work, OHIP etc. If benefits are important then work. If individuals that have exceeded a set cost due to a serious need for expensive drugs then some subsidy could be provided by the government. Retirees that have worked and contributed for many years should be covered. The government needs to initiate some cost controls over the pharmaceutical companies that have no constraints. Taxes. Insurance, Pharmaceuticals and Government can spend or charge without monitoring. |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Education › University Tuition
4>4 Personal answerRegardless, privatize education and let the free market determine the tuition rates |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
4>4 Personal answerLower |
the Environment › Logging
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Immigration
4>4 Personal answerYes. Not only should there be stronger immigration policies but there should be a requirement to enforce the obligation of new immigrant to conform to the laws and standards set by established Canadians. Here's an easy acid test. Choose any long term established Canadians family 2nd, 3rd, 4th generation in Canada. If those family members can perform an act, then any family can also perform the act and vice-versa. If the established Canadian family can block the QEW in protest without any criticism or legal actions, then anyone can. If that family performs that same act and is penalized then everyone should be treated the same. Void of discrimination. We should have a document signed as per Australia's standards and enforce it. |
Social › Niqāb
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
4>4 Personal answerNo businesses are already over regulated and as a result relocating to other countries. Most of these other countries have zero environmental regs but are performing work once located in NA. and defiantly announced the increase of pollutants in order to manufacture the increased business. Try encouraging companies to return or invest by giving incentives, reasonable regulations and at the same time discourage other countries from investing in those locations. New industry in NA will bring Jobs, power usages, business taxes, support associated supplier business, etc. Then before those jobs are appointed to immigration be sure every established Canadian is working. Global warming is not a natural event but my research would support the primary cause is population. The world can not sustain increase in population. Ever wonder why most of the poorest countries have the greatest number of people???? |
Social › Women in Combat
4>4 Personal answerIf the inclusion concern for females is the primary agenda then a standard testing and qualification program should be developed that reflects the demands of the job (be it military combat, firefighting, policing, H.R.) and every candidate should be required to meet these standards. One standard for everyone without compromise. Whom ever can meet these standards can participate in a selection process. REAL EQUALITY void of PC influence. |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
4>4 Personal answerNo. If the energy program was managed properly and used business models to run the department instead of manipulating the subject to encourage support for the political gain and to ensure PC influences are met, there should be ample energy to support Canada now. It may also be a sound business decision not to give energy away to other countries. I live in SW Ontario where you can't spit without hitting a Wind Powered Energy Generating monstrosity yet we have constant interruptions and power outages but you can hear the free electricity heading north to Detriot. |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
4>4 Personal answerDecrease, and the government should provide more incentives to prepare our citizens for these jobs |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Pension Tax
4>4 Personal answerNo. My financial analysis related to my pension was based on the current interest rate, cost of living (gas, electricity, property taxes Vehicle/house insurance, medical costs etc) at the time I retired. Based on these factors my retirement finances looked sustainable. Now with increase of all the commodities, taxes, lower interest, etc. my fixed income holds less disposable/purchasing funds. I wish we would choose not to provide billions of $$ to other countries, refugee immigration and aboriginal hand outs and provide more for the contributing and established Canadians. I would be more in favour of supporting other countries/foreign aid and aboriginals, however our government is happy to invest our money without any business auditing or accountability. Of interest, with the billions that have been given away there is obviously no improvements as the same organizations and countries come back every year for more. Major financial investment without improvements is a poor business decision??/ |
Crime › Parole Hearings
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Campaign Finance
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Prime Minister Term Limits
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Quebec Sovereignty
4>4 Personal answerNo. The French lost the war to Britain and they should be required to exist as the rest of Canada. No more special financial hand out, no more french language only, no more requirement to speak french to qualify for P.M. They country including Quebec is Canada anything else is treason. Maybe a little less arrogance could be required as well. |
Immigration › Temporary Foreign Workers
4>4 Personal answerDecrease |
Education › Postsecondary Education
4>4 Personal answerThe government should not be involved in education |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Commercial Drones
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y
▲ 6.4k121 replies
@ISIDEWITH asked…6 days6D
▲ 7721.8k replies
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
