Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filter by tag

These are currently the most active tagged discussions.

Filter by author knowledge

Show discussions from authors that have these achievements:

Show discussions from expert pundits on:

Options

 @B4J3VX2from Ontario  answered…6hrs6H

I think current amount is fine as long as it’s to friendly allied countries. However not adding to deficit.

 @B4J3D6Jfrom Alberta  answered…6hrs6H

Yes, there is too much misinformation about nuclear energy; it is a safe and efficient source of energy with zero emissons.

 @B4J3D6Jfrom Alberta  answered…6hrs6H

As long as it is not private/public property and the arsonist has ownership of it then it doesn't matter.

 @B4J3D6Jfrom Alberta  answered…6hrs6H

The Canadian government should instead focus on large businesses within its own country instead: Bell, Rogers, Enmax, etc.

 @B4HZF6Dfrom Ontario  answered…9hrs9H

Yes if medications are needed to maintain their health and are expensive such as diabetes medications.

 @B4HZ9ZDfrom Alberta  answered…9hrs9H

For homeless disabled and low income but not at expense of green space. Build up not out, or revitalize.

 @B4HYM2Kfrom Nova Scotia  answered…10hrs10H

Government spending must be audited and held accountable for waste and overspending. Also need less beaurocrats

 @B4HXDJGfrom Nova Scotia  answered…11hrs11H

Yes to some extent but ensuring police receiving enough funding to be able to properly and safely do their jobs

 @ISIDEWITH linked…2hrs2H

Who Stands to Win in Poilievre’s Canada: Oil Magnates

 @ISIDEWITH linked…2hrs2H

Pierre Poilievre promises to speed up approvals for resource projects