+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.1k Left voters.

72%
Yes
28%
No
72%
Yes
28%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.1k Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.1k Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZVXBWMfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4 days4D

I think there should be some restrictions to ensure that there is not too much regulation that could cause problems.

 @9RJ6K3Vfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but all citizens should be ensured they have the inherent right to refuse medical treatments at all times.

 @9RCBSYBfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

The government should regulate CRISPR with an eye to not regulating to the point of stifling innovation and scientific progress.

 @9RBVFQQfrom Prince Edward Island  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but not too much. CRISPR has the potential to be transformative for the entirety of the human race and should be embraced as such.

 @9RBPNXJfrom Alberta  answered…4mos4MO

They should start thinking about how to properly do this. However it's important to remember genetic diversity is ultimately humanities best chance at future survival.

 @9RBNFB7from British Columbia  answered…4mos4MO

Human genomic editing should only be done for genetic diseases or to correct epigenetic markers affecting the health of the individual, not affecting gametes

 @9R4Q69Pfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

genetic modifications as in what? to save someone life? Or only because they want it?

 @9QZTDKHfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

Yes only if the technology is proven to be safe for use, because then it would be like taking a medical surgery for a health issue.