CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2013)
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 304 Social Democracy voters.
71% Yes |
29% No |
71% Yes |
29% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 304 Social Democracy voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 304 Social Democracy voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Social Democracy voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9PGWNV410mos10MO
Yes, it should only be used to prevent disabilities.
@9P8NRFM 10mos10MO
Yes, as long as CRISPR technology is safe and suitable for use.
@9NLZHKS11mos11MO
if is regulated strictly and used for those who need it like people with immunity problems and not the highest bidder
@9NJMFYZ11mos11MO
I agree with the idea of genetically modifying people but private companies should be in control of that because the government will just millitarize it
@9NJKWVP11mos11MO
Yes, but only after the CRISPR technology is suitable for use.
@9NJKGTB11mos11MO
There should be no gender reassignment surgeries allowed
@9MXNDX311mos11MO
Maybe to fix any diseases or genetic differences and maybe to prevent disease from occurring in the human body but not to change a person.
@9FGSKLL 11mos11MO
Yes, but only moderate regulation so that a corporate monopoly can not happen
Join in on the most popular conversations.