CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2013)
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 255 Federalism voters.
58% Yes |
42% No |
58% Yes |
42% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 255 Federalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 255 Federalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Federalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9MP7X296mos6MO
No, adding chemicals to children to make them "better", as well as the possible mistakes, makes me completely disagree with the regulation.
@9MP6SK26mos6MO
up to the people if they want to change there kids and not others
@9MP6H7P6mos6MO
I think that's weird and shouldn't be allowed unless it's used to prevent illness or something life-threatening.
@9MN6QYS6mos6MO
yes, as long as it is known and approved by the people it is going to affect
@9SNLZ3S3mos3MO
Only for the benefit of communal health for all citizens and residents if they are required to have an organ transplant or genetic modification for better quality of life or to avoid death.
@9RXS4P4 4mos4MO
i feel like more research has to be done on the long term effects, and more risks should be eliminated before the use of CRISPR technology should become regulated.
@9RJ6K3V4mos4MO
Yes, but all citizens should be ensured they have the inherent right to refuse medical treatments at all times.
@9RCBSYB4mos4MO
The government should regulate CRISPR with an eye to not regulating to the point of stifling innovation and scientific progress.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
