+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 429 Independents voters.

70%
Yes
30%
No
70%
Yes
30%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 429 Independents voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 429 Independents voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Independents voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9MP7X29from Saskatchewan  answered…6mos6MO

No, adding chemicals to children to make them "better", as well as the possible mistakes, makes me completely disagree with the regulation.

 @9MP6SK2from Saskatchewan  answered…6mos6MO

 @9MP6H7Pfrom Saskatchewan  answered…6mos6MO

I think that's weird and shouldn't be allowed unless it's used to prevent illness or something life-threatening.

 @9MN6QYSfrom Alberta  answered…6mos6MO

yes, as long as it is known and approved by the people it is going to affect

 @9SNLZ3Sfrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

Only for the benefit of communal health for all citizens and residents if they are required to have an organ transplant or genetic modification for better quality of life or to avoid death.

 @9RXS4P4 from Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

i feel like more research has to be done on the long term effects, and more risks should be eliminated before the use of CRISPR technology should become regulated.

 @9RJ6K3Vfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but all citizens should be ensured they have the inherent right to refuse medical treatments at all times.

 @9RCBSYBfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

The government should regulate CRISPR with an eye to not regulating to the point of stifling innovation and scientific progress.