CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2013)
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 5.7k Canada voters.
65% Yes |
35% No |
65% Yes |
35% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 5.7k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 5.7k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9QZTDKH9mos9MO
Yes only if the technology is proven to be safe for use, because then it would be like taking a medical surgery for a health issue.
@9QW7TQZ9mos9MO
Yes, and nationalize it to make sure it is regulated properly and consistently.
@9PGWNV410mos10MO
Yes, it should only be used to prevent disabilities.
@9P8NRFM 10mos10MO
Yes, as long as CRISPR technology is safe and suitable for use.
@9NLZHKS11mos11MO
if is regulated strictly and used for those who need it like people with immunity problems and not the highest bidder
@9NJMFYZ11mos11MO
I agree with the idea of genetically modifying people but private companies should be in control of that because the government will just millitarize it
@9NJKWVP11mos11MO
Yes, but only after the CRISPR technology is suitable for use.
@9NJKGTB11mos11MO
There should be no gender reassignment surgeries allowed
Join in on the most popular conversations.