Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Show more types:

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Electoral District (2011):

Electoral District (2013):

715 Replies

 @8PPLF2TNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Abortions ought to be legal, however, Males ought to be held to much more account for the abortions.. Unwanted Pregnancies are 99% the fault of the Male, therefore, after being found responsible for 3 abortions, that Male must undergo a vasectomy and be barred from starting a family later on. - IF WE ARE TO BE SERIOUS ABOUT THIS.. we must take serious actions. Males are inherently irresponsible.. and are left to go thru life totally unaffected by their choices, while society destroys that female for it. - this is completely unfair, unjust and barbaric.

 @8DSG5P5New Democraticfrom Quebec  answered…5yrs5Y

pro choice, birth control, sex ed, and more social services to avoid the need for them as most teen pregnancies are from expected abstinence meaning that no one teaches them what to do and how to avoid pregnancy, nor do they provide the means for birthcontrol. and birth control should be free. however, no abortions after three months save for health reasons or the baby dies in the womb.

 @9M6758BNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…12mos12MO

Neither. Government has no business dictating the rights of women’s health. When did we become having American politicians in the House of Commons.

 @9LC5HMJNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Pro-life, but allow in cases o rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child and also Pro-choice,but ban after the first three months

 @9K72PYHNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Let women who can have children vote. And the remainder of us accept the outcome. Renew vote every 10 years.

 @9G5NKD7New Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

pro-Abortion, I understand that abortion is a medical procedure that is only between the patient and the their medical team, and whom the patient chooses to be involved.

 @9G4QVFHNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

In cases of non-assault situations, both parents should have a choice if the father is still present.

 @9D85P6CNew Democraticfrom Nova Scotia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9ZJ57FGNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

abortion should be legal since if a pregnancy goes wrong her baby won't rot in her belly and the pregnant woman won't die due to rotting

 @8G3ZC5DNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…5yrs5Y

D social supports should be put into place so that this is no longer an issue.

 @99ZF3YXNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

Pro-life, the government providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

 @95YJRW3New Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

MY BODY, MY CHOICE! It should be my choice!
Example:
12 year old: Hey! Can I adopt a baby?
Adoption Lady: No! Your too young!

12 year old girl: I was raped! Can I get an abortion?
Abortion Lady: No. Sorry, it's just too dangerous and that's now illegal.

It should be my choice if I want/need an abortion!

 @937XPL5New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92L9KW7New Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

pro-choice but after a certain amount of time its not an option any more

 @8ZST28DNew Democraticfrom Nova Scotia  answered…3yrs3Y

Pro-life, victims of rape and incest can just give the baby to orphanage if they don't want the baby as to it does not done something wrong

 @8ZL7SS2New Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Pro life, but I think adoption should be made easier for mothers in need who cannot take care of there own child.

 @8YXY6DNNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

It's against the Bible. God didn't give women the power to give birth so they could get rid of it. It's also a sin.

 @8X23Y7XNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Pro-choice, but if it's something like "My baby is not perfect, sp I don't want to keep them" then too bad!

 @8WRKZ85New Democraticfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4yrs4Y

you should be able to have an abortion until the baby has a heartbeat and starts growing

 @8VY4BNLNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

I am very religious but also pro choice, i think there should be conditions. like for example rape or threatens the mothers life.

 @8VS7GKCNew Democraticfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4yrs4Y

If you are going to abort the child make sure u don’t wait and do it as soon as possible in the first stage

 @8VMRLW4New Democraticfrom Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

I am pro-choice but people women should not come to rely on it for being irresponsible. In the case of rape and incest I fully support abortion.

 @8VM85YMNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Although I hate the idea of abortion, I do believe women should have the same control over there bodies as men. Every effort should be made to avoid abortion for example
No late term abortion
Assistance to women who choose to keep their babies
Liberal access to and education regarding birth control
Teens should be able to receive birth control without parental consent at any age along with counselling
Adoption options should include support during pregnancy

I believe that babies should be valued by our whole society. Our population growth is too low.

 @8VLKTVSNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

pro choice, the government has no right to tell me what I can do with my body

 @8VLDWFRNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VHZ343New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro life but allow depending on severe situations and age of pregnancy. In general a focus on bettering sex education, birth control, resources for mothers would reduce the number of abortions.

 @8VH9R5VNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TZWW9PNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro choice but ban after the first 3 months and increase acces to birth control, security education and other social services

 @8TV88B5New Democraticfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-choice, providing birth control, and sex education to reduce abortion rates and fund research into safer less invasive abortion procedures

 @8TSKJBVNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, but do not believe banning abortion should be the first step in abolishing the option.

 @8SMLJTDNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-Choice but have the option for doctors to refuse to have the option to abort

 @8RKHCK8New Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, and provide adequate sexual education measures to mitigate the need for abortions.

 @8R425KYNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

pro-choice yet on the local/provincial government level if they are pro-life/ ban abortion, that government must provide support for that individual and the Child

 @8Q679ZZNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

I am religious, and as a religious person we already don't support it therefore i am pro-life

 @8PZSNFTNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, however governments should not ban abortion but heavily promote and subside adoption and other services.

 @8PJ7NZYNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

I believe that abortion should be allowed only under a severe condition.

 @8LT2F2FNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

It is not my choice. It is the mothers choice since it is her body and not ours.

 @ZaneThind17New Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

My own opinion is that the family should decide with the humans that are having the kid. Also make sure the girl wants go with the process and not have her regret her decision after the process.

 @8KDC9K7New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

your body your choice, whatever the circumstances are you have a choice and no one and say otherwise.

 @8K76JSQNew Democraticfrom Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-Choice. The government has NO RIGHT to regulate women's bodies. NONE. The only person allowed to make a decision is the individual carrying the foetus. No Uterus, NO OPINION. Not your body? NO OPINION. Not your life? NO OPINION.

 @8H94CWFNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8F4W8DCNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…5yrs5Y

 @9WNCQDSNew Democraticfrom Saskatchewan  answered…6mos6MO

Pro-choice

Engaged Abortion

People who are pro-life are stupid and don't understand how pregnancy effects the body. Life doesn't begin at conception and Canada is not, and should not ever be a Theocracy.

 @9CS3LQGNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

Pro-life, but allow in cases of risk to the mother, rape, or other circumstance. Increase sex education, and contraception availability (excluding birth control).

 @9BPTQZ3New Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

 @99DBDYLNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @99CJGGJNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Pro choice, I do not agree with abortion but in cases of rape, incest,dangers, extreme cases should it be allowed, as well as there should be a limit imposed on women for how many abortions can be had in a life time with the exception of the above mentioned( so if you are raped, it would not count towards the limit , but would also be investigated, for obvious reasons)

 @97M454KNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9399XCLNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

i think every women should have the choice of their own body, other people shouldnt have the choice own youre own body. i think you should have youre own choice own youre own body.

 @8WNHTXHNew Democraticfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-choice but only if abortion is not used as a means to terminate a pregnancy multiple times by a woman.

 @8HPF57B from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8P5GKWH from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-choice and pro-life. However the would-be parent(s) need to be educated as to the moral and health repercussions. God gives life, but He also allows us the power to choose.

 @887SFZP from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-choice before the third trimester unless in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child.

 @8R8K8WM from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, but allow abortion in first month and providing birth control, pregnancy tests, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

 @8R875L2 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Abortions should be allowed for women. The government has no right to determine if a woman should keep her child or if she should abort it. Only a woman knows herself what she is going through and she doesn't have to share her reasoning with anyone.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first two months unless there is danger to the physical health of the mother or child.

 @8S2LJ24 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

 @8S2LJ24 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions so that they don't happen in the first place

 @8L5M7X6 from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

Women should have the choice of whether they abort their child or not. Additionally, taking away their right to abortion would not prevent it. Desperate women will find unsafe ways to abort their child which might lead to infection or even death.

 @32D8XZ7answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, but allow for the first three months, or in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban during the final trimester of pregnancy unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after 16 weeks of gestation unless there is danger to the health of the mother or unborn child

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months unless there is danger to the health of the mother or unborn child

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months unless there are complications that present danger to the mother or child

 @8TY854Q from Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, danger to the mother or child, or if the woman is a minor it should be allowed.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first trimester of pregnancy unless there are complications that present danger to the mother or child

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the 20th week of pregnancy unless there are complications that present danger to the mother or child

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months of pregnancy unless there are complications that present danger to the mother or child

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months of pregnancy except in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the 20th week of gestation (when a fetus can feel pain) unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the second trimester unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @8VYQC3H from Vermont  answered…4yrs4Y

In between, I believe it is up to the person and the circumstances, it should not be used as a backup plan, perhaps there should be a time limit on the abortion.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the second trimester unless there is danger to the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first four months of pregnancy are completed unless there is danger to the health of the mother or unborn child

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first trimester of pregnancy is completed unless there is danger to the health of the mother or unborn child

 @8XK8XXG from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

If you are raped if think you should be able to choose if you want the baby or not but if you accidently got pregnant then should have the baby

 @8XTW3QC from Washington D.C.  answered…3yrs3Y

Pro-life, but i don't think the government has the right to regulate abortion

 @8Y5H9DW from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Pro-choice, I don't believe it is in the best interest of the people to ban abortions outright. However, more should be done to provide quality sex education, free contraceptives, and other social services.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban during the final trimester of pregnancy unless there is danger to the health of the mother or unborn child

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first 120 days of gestation unless there is danger to the mother or child

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first 120 days unless there is danger to the mother or child

 @929HXZF from Minnesota  answered…3yrs3Y

its not okay to kill a baby its not his fault to be born and you take his life.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first 120 days unless there is danger to the health of the mother or child

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first 120 days of pregnancy unless there is danger to the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first four months (120 days) unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first four months unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first four months unless there is danger to health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months unless there is danger to health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months unless there is danger to the mother or fetus

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...