Try the political quiz
@9G9WTDM Agreements1yr ago

if the mother is unable to support nore give a child the structure needed to guide the child to success they should have the right to abort.

10 Replies

 @9GB9K37from Alberta  disagreed…1yr1Y

No that is still the murder of a child the mother should find other recourses to help care for the child and give it a chance instead of murder

 @9GB2QCRConservativefrom Alberta  disagreed…1yr1Y

No. I am pretty black and white with this topic. If a woman gets pregnant and cannot afford to support her child then why would you even bother getting pregnant in the first place? And if the woman didn't decide or plan to get pregnant and cannot afford to support the child there are options to give that child a life i.e. adoption. Even though adoption is not ideal this gives the child a chance to have a life.

 @9GCT8FVfrom Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

Every life matter but if you're not ready to guide the child, instead of killing them try to give baby to adoption or for an orphanage.

 @9GBD47XConservativefrom Alberta  disagreed…1yr1Y

Every child should have the right to grow up unless the child was a cause of rape or incest. I believe that parents do not have the right to abort because every child deserves a chance at life.

 @9GGPDX7from Ontario  agreed…1yr1Y

Yes they should. It's a womens chioce what to do with their body. She knows she cannot support this child nore herself. It's a responible decision for the child and for herself.

 @9GCQVQTfrom New York  agreed…1yr1Y

anyone should have the right. its not your body, its not your choice. if you dont want one... dont get one

 @9GCFV3VNew Democraticfrom New Brunswick  agreed…1yr1Y

Yes i do, i don't think poor people who cant afford to give their children a good life should have kids at all. Not everybody is meant to be a parent.

 @9GB3MF2People’sfrom British Columbia  agreed…1yr1Y

If a young girl ends up pregnant when not intended to be or was unconsent ally forced into doing the activity, she shouldn't have to be forced to give birth to the child when it wasn't her fault in the first place, or if she cant support the child it should be her choice if she would want to keep it or not.

 @9GBCPKPConservativefrom Alberta  disagreed…1yr1Y

I do not believe this is acceptable, as it is not by random chance to get pregnant. The mother should have checked all of these things before getting involved in sexual activity, as life starts right from the beginning of the pregnancy.

 @9GB97RBfrom Manitoba  disagreed…1yr1Y

If a mother can not support or give their unborn child the care that they need, then they should nit have unprotected sex.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this agreement.

@9G9WTDM

Last activeActivity1 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias100%Active in
Agreements  1
PartyUndeclaredLocationFredericton, NB

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1mo1MO

Vetting Fiasco: Trump's Defense Pick Caught in Sexual Assault Allegation Storm

CNN commentator and New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman said President-elect Donald Trump’s team missed Pete Hegseth’s payoff to a sexual assault accuser when they vetted him to be secretary of defense.Hegseth is among a raft of cabinet picks facing tough confirmations, and who aren’t being subjected to the customary FBI checks, instead being vetted by private firms. Over the weekend, Hegseth’s attorney dropped the bomb that there was a confidential settlement with a woman who accused the former Fox News host of sexual assault. On Monday night’s edition of CNN’s The Source with Kaitlan Collins, Haberman revealed that her sources in Trump world did not know about the payoff, which was missed in the vetting “because it was a private settlement”HABERMAN: There’s more concern from some people around Trump than there is from Trump himself, about this whole issue. Trump has really dug in, and has told advisers that he is going to stick with Hegseth. Now, we’ll see if anything else emerges.They did do a vet, we are told. This did not show up, this issue, because it was a private settlement, according to the people, who were briefed on what took place. Trump really likes Pete Hegseth. But this did introduce the thing Trump doesn’t like, which is an element of surprise and a negative headline. And so, we will see where this goes.

▲  59 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2mos2MO

Inside the Podcast Revolution: Trump’s Unfiltered Strategy and Harris’s ‘Meltdown’ Risk

Tech billionaire Elon Musk attributed President-elect Trump’s election victory, at least in part, to the lengthy podcast interviews he did during the campaign.In an interview late Tuesday with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, Musk said Trump’s podcast appearances showed the American public that he was a normal person.“I think it made a big difference that President Trump and soon-to-be Vice President Vance went on lengthy podcasts,” Musk said in the interview.“I think this really makes a difference because people look at, like, Joe Rogan’s podcast, which is great, and Lex Fridman’s and the All-In podcast, and, you know, to a reasonable-minded, smart person — who’s not, like, hardcore one way or the other — they just listen to someone talk for a few hours and that’s how they decide whether, you know, you’re a good person, whether they like you,” he added, according to a clip highlighted by Mediaite.Trump conducted many interviews with new media during his campaign, as well as with legacy news organizations such as Fox News.Last month, he joined Joe Rogan’s podcast for a 3-hour long interview. The celebrity host later endorsed his candidacy.His opponent, Vice President Harris, did not appear on Rogan’s podcast because, according to “The Joe Rogan Experience” host, the Harris campaign only had an hour and required him to travel to her. Rogan said he felt “strongly” that the “best way to do” an interview with the vice president would have been in his studio in Austin, Texas.Musk recalled posting on his social platform X account that “nothing would do more damage” to Harris’s campaign than going on Rogan’s podcast, “because she would run out of non-sequiturs after about 45 minutes.”“You can’t hide for three hours,” Carlson replied.Musk added, “Yeah, like, hour two and three would be a complete melted puddle of nonsense. So it would just be absolute game over. That’s why she didn’t go on.”“But on the other hand, Trump, he’s there, and there’s no, there’s no talking points,” the Tesla CEO continued. “He’s just being a normal person who’s having a conversation, and doing three hours of Rogan, no problem.”

▲  349 replies

Active 13hrs ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…7 days7D

Defense Bill Blocks Transgender Care To Minors

The Senate on Wednesday gave final approval to a defense policy bill directing $895 billion toward the Pentagon and other military activities, moving over the objections of some Democrats who opposed a provision added late in the negotiations that would deny coverage for transgender health procedures for minors.The 85-to-14 vote, coming a week after a divided House passed the same measure, cleared the bill for President Biden’s signature.Most Republicans and many Democrats supported the measure, which provides a 14.5 percent pay raise to junior enlisted service members and a 4.5 percent pay raise for all other service members. It also expands access to meal assistance, housing and child care programs that benefit those in uniform.But several Democrats withheld their backing in protest of a provision preventing TRICARE, the military’s health care plan for service members, from covering “medical interventions for the treatment of gender dysphoria that could result in sterilization” for children under 18.The language, which would affect the gender-transitioning children of service members, was recently added to the measure at the insistence of Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican of Louisiana, who refused to bring a defense bill to the House floor without it, according to aides familiar with the negotiations.Twenty-one Democrats, led by Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, proposed an amendment to strip the provision from the bill, but the matter was never brought to a vote. Several of them took to the floor on Tuesday to lodge their objections.“It’s flat-out wrong to put this provision in this bill and take away a service member’s freedom to make that decision for their families,” Ms. Baldwin said, estimating that the provision could negatively affect as many as 6,000 to 7,000 military families.

▲  1913 replies3 agree