Ride-sharing services, like Uber and Lyft, provide transportation options that can be subsidized to make them more affordable for low-income individuals. Proponents argue that it increases mobility for low-income individuals, reduces reliance on personal vehicles, and can reduce traffic congestion. Opponents argue that it is a misuse of public funds, may benefit ride-sharing companies more than individuals, and could discourage public transportation use.
Response rates from 304 Left voters.
58% Yes |
42% No |
58% Yes |
42% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 304 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 304 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZCJ32Y2wks2W
Yes, but only if high-quality and affordable public transit is not available in their area.
@9YCJHXJ2wks2W
No, we should subsidize electric cars and public transportation
@9WBC5PZ1mo1MO
Yes but only if public transportation is not already available.
@carsonmyers 2mos2MO
Yes, and invest in and provide free access to public transit
@carsonmyers 2mos2MO
No, provide government-run services, including public transit and other alternative means of travel
@9RMDWZQ4mos4MO
No. But we need a huge improvement in public transit and that can be subsidized
@9RC3SBW4mos4MO
No, improve municipal and inter-city public transit
@9RBY87R4mos4MO
No, use that funding toward improving pre-existing public transportation
Join in on the most popular conversations.
