Ride-sharing services, like Uber and Lyft, provide transportation options that can be subsidized to make them more affordable for low-income individuals. Proponents argue that it increases mobility for low-income individuals, reduces reliance on personal vehicles, and can reduce traffic congestion. Opponents argue that it is a misuse of public funds, may benefit ride-sharing companies more than individuals, and could discourage public transportation use.
Response rates from 626 Canada voters.
48% Yes |
52% No |
48% Yes |
52% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 626 Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 626 Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B25TXWW6 days6D
No, they should instead invest in public transportation.
@9WBC5PZ2mos2MO
Yes but only if public transportation is not already available.
@carsonmyers 3mos3MO
Yes, and invest in and provide free access to public transit
@carsonmyers 3mos3MO
No, provide government-run services, including public transit and other alternative means of travel
@9RMDWZQ5mos5MO
No. But we need a huge improvement in public transit and that can be subsidized
@9RC3SBW5mos5MO
No, improve municipal and inter-city public transit
@9RBY87R5mos5MO
No, use that funding toward improving pre-existing public transportation
@9RBRBYR5mos5MO
No, and the ride-sharing services drivers need protection from exploitation.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
