+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 230 University--Rosedale voters.

58%
Yes
42%
No
58%
Yes
42%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 230 University--Rosedale voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 230 University--Rosedale voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from University--Rosedale voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B4RFBT5from Alberta  answered…4 days4D

Only on people that have become low income against their own choices (not people who are low income because of drugs/alcohol)

 @B4LKMK2from Alberta  answered…2wks2W

No there is public transit and trains that for people that can’t drive, won’t drive, or can’t afford to drive. Possibly subsidized transit costs could be offered on a case by case basis dependent on income. I believe only a subsidy should be offered to these individuals as long as they hold a full time job.

 @B4FSPN5from Nova Scotia  answered…2wks2W

Yes, but making sure the people doing these jobs are people who do not put others in uncomfortable, or dangerous situations.

 @B3KBJM3answered…2mos2MO

No, the government should make public transport free for low -income individuals.Investing in companies like Uber benefits the company in itself.

 @B3FH9CFfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

with a limit on miles and income that can be helped I think it is important for this to be an option

 @B3CPZL7answered…2mos2MO

Should the Italian prime minister lower incomes of divide sharing by Australia prime minister how came along with subsidiaries individual services

 @B38Z9PKfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but only if there is insufficient public transportation and the need for transportation is reasonable.

 @B37ZK3Kfrom Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

Yes but it should he stringent on being able to get the passes (ie they need to show how they use it going to work etc)