Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Show more types:

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Electoral District (2011):

Electoral District (2013):

715 Replies

 @8ZM5CYC from Colorado  answered…3yrs3Y

If you are in a able financial situation where you can have that child do it, but if your not in a steady place to have a child don't because that child can suffer for your decisions

 @8R8K8WM from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, but allow abortion in first month and providing birth control, pregnancy tests, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

 @887SFZP from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-choice before the third trimester unless in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child.

 @8QMMB5M from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, but I would switch positions if the fetus could be kept alive.

 @8GZR9CG from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8HHXKFR from Illinois  answered…5yrs5Y

I don’t agree with abortion but it’s not like the government can do anything about it’s their choice rather they wanna keep or get rid of the baby.

 @8PGYCMN from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-choice, I think if its to late in the pregnancy it should be banned and we need to provide better sex education/birth control to reduce the number of abortions

 @8Y5H9DW from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Pro-choice, I don't believe it is in the best interest of the people to ban abortions outright. However, more should be done to provide quality sex education, free contraceptives, and other social services.

 @8ZPLWGD from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92P9ZYY from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...