Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Show more types:

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Electoral District (2011):

Electoral District (2013):

715 Replies

 @8JW33M8from Alberta  answered…5yrs5Y

Let the lady do what she has to do, if it’s a harm to her or the child then why keep it? If you’re broke and struggling in life, why keep it? If the spouse wants to have kids, then they should state so way before the relationship starts. They should also have a job to support said lady and child.

 @B28SGLNfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4mos4MO

Pro-choice, I don’t agree but the government has no right to ban it

Women have only gained momentum on their rights and research into our specific biology and equality within the last 50 years. Stop blocking our freedoms. Just stop.

 @corafrom Manitoba  answered…5mos5MO

Pro-choice

No right to ban

There are several factors to me being pro-choice.

  1. The government has no right to regulate abortions
  2. Children should be able to live in homes where they are loved, not hated
  3. Children should be able to live where they can get support, emotional and financial
  4. Nobody should be forced to give birth to a baby that's a result of rape or incest
  5. A unborn fetus is not the same as a fully born human being
  6. Nobody that's a minor should be forced to give birth to a baby+

 @96P6VZXfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @966STJTfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

100% abortion should be legal for everyone no matter what if you disagree you should be sentenced to death you are disgusting.

 @922WZ4Lfrom Nova Scotia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZHL5SCfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8WCY6VWLibertarianfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-Choice, provide birth control, sex ed, more social services to reduce the number of abortions but ban after the first four to five months.

 @8VWTC45Libertarianfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VLLX6Hfrom Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-choice, the government has no place in banning but abortion is awful. After 4months it should not be allowed

 @8VK5JXPfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

All abortion should be provided safely and freely at any point in the pregnancy without judgment or stigma. Not supporting abortion is in no way "pro life"'

 @8VHZ343New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro life but allow depending on severe situations and age of pregnancy. In general a focus on bettering sex education, birth control, resources for mothers would reduce the number of abortions.

 @8V675NYfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro choice but you should only get a certain amount of abortions until you have to pay for them out of pocket.

 @8V4SQZTGreenfrom Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TY3D4PLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-choice but ban after the first three months unless medically necessary.

 @8TWZ8FXConservativefrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

I believe that abortions should be legal and free if you’re under the age, raped, incest, or there is a danger otherwise I feel they should be paid for.

 @8TWNHRPfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes if the mother is a victim but if not, the father should be involved in the decision if the father is known and give him a chance to take sole custody

 @8TW4RDKfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

It's not really about pro-life or pro-choice. There is no evidence that it's even an ethical relevant issue, so it doesn't matter.

 @8TN4WYQfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8THSH6Wfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TB5HCWfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8T9GPJMfrom Manitoba  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-choice, but I don't agree with aborting if the parties were irresponsible and had not used protection.

 @8T45WJKLiberalfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

If Mother unable to give birth/ have to give baby up. More social services will reduce the need for this question though

 @8SLWNCXfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SLTL92from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SD3WN8from Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

I say yes for the woman but allow the guys to choose if they want to take care of the child. If a woman can kill the thing at least let the guy leave it

 @8RMSZKVfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

its up to the women, its her body and her child so in the end it dosent matter what in the end its her choise

 @8RB7QRCfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-Choice, but ban after the first 3 months. Provide birth control, sex education and more social services to reduce the number of abortions.

 @8QWVC4Lfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services

 @8PMFZRBfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Well, there are pros and cons to both. So I would say that I agree with both in a certain context

 @8PKT8DHfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child. And I also think that we should be providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

 @8PJFZ8Nfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

It is the female choice if she would like to keep the baby or not no one can change her opinion because after all it is her child

 @8KL8NGVfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro choice provide birth control, sex ed, more social services and ban after three months

 @8KDC9K7New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

your body your choice, whatever the circumstances are you have a choice and no one and say otherwise.

 @9CZRKVXfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

You have the right to choose what to do to your body and live with that choice

 @9CMRHK8from Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Neutral on the decision, it all comes down to whether or not the mother wants to proceed with an abortion or not, as it is her kid.

 @9CMFZRNfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

pro- choice, it is that persons decision what they do with their body and life.

 @992GH2Ffrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @96TBK6Mfrom New Brunswick  answered…2yrs2Y

People should be able to decide to do whatever they want with the baby. It shouldn’t be in outages to get abortions but, if someone doesn’t want or can’t have the baby, they shouldn’t be forced to have one.

 @8KSPPR9from Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, ban after the first three months and provide birth control, sex ed., and more social services

 @8T4F745 from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

Pro-Life, but providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of infanticides

 @8Y5H9DW from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Pro-choice, I don't believe it is in the best interest of the people to ban abortions outright. However, more should be done to provide quality sex education, free contraceptives, and other social services.

 @8YMT7T3 from California  answered…3yrs3Y

It is the persons choice weather or not they want to get an abortion. It's no one else's body but theirs and they have the right to do whatever they want with it. Pro choice.

 @8S2LJ24 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

 @8S2LJ24 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions so that they don't happen in the first place

 @6PGMWLQ from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-choice to the point of sentience, and try to reduce abortions after sentience through birth control, sex education, and social services

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...