The U.S. constitution does not prevent convicted felons from holding the office of the President or a seat in the Senate or House of Representatives. States may prevent convicted felons candidates from holding statewide and local offices.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
Yes, as long as the crime both was not commited whilst in office, and was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime.
@8VJVJMR4yrs4Y
Depends on the circumstances. The person might be a member of a marginalized group and convicted out of hate and inequities in the society & justice system.
@B4NR6762 days2D
Its easy to be accused of doing something and not have done it ever so Id say to a limit yes they should be allowed to run
@B4MYRBK4 days4D
No, in a democracy voters should be allowed to make poor choices if they so choose. However, we should have more transparency in our elections with all candidates, not just criminals, to ensure that citizens are making informed decisions
@B3FQZNN2mos2MO
Hell no!!! I know there are exceptions to the rule, but I hope there are more decent people to choose from.
@9QQN2BL10mos10MO
Yes, however the crime's severity should be put in consideration. If the crime is something like theft under $500 let them run after sentence but if the crime is grand larceny then no because they are given to much power in office.
@9LHMPCJ1yr1Y
In many democracies, the eligibility of politicians who had previously been condemned for a crime will depend on the nature of said crime, the time elapsed since the conviction, and any rehabilitation session demonstrated. Usually, the arguments in favour generally revolve around the regulations of redemption, which likely suggest suspects who served sentences should be allowed to participate fully in society. I would jest that this includes holding public office regarding anyone in that position carrying the burden of trust and responsibility. This ultimately led to the decision to allow ex-criminals to run for office as part of matters of law and public policy.
@9KQRSQ91yr1Y
No, and any politician that has received funding, gifts, or any other means of profit from private companies, lobbyists, corperate interests, private energy, religious groups should be under investigation for a crime with possibility of the death penalty
@9KN53CC1yr1Y
Yes, as long as it has been at least 10 years since their release from prison and if not sent to prison their conviction.
It depends on the nature of the crime, the severity, and whether the individual has been rehabilitated.
@9JBXLXS1yr1Y
It really depends on the crime, and the nature of it. Though in the case of violence only if it’s out of self defence, and aren’t getting away with things like racism, ableism, or sexism when being PM.
@9J4QTKJConservative1yr1Y
No and there should be a certain and strict guideline/check list for individuals to complete to be able to run
@9HBK2PG1yr1Y
yes as long as they do a certain amount of good deeds like community hours and are proven to turn their life around.
@9H8Z6RJ1yr1Y
I believe that everyone deserves a second chance but putting someone in charge of many others that has commited a crime is just not ethical.
@9H2DR3T1yr1Y
it depends on the crime that he has done a big crime then no if a smaller crime then they should consider voting for him
@9GPTXMR1yr1Y
maybe. Yes, as long as the crime does not impact their ability lead in an ethical and unbiased way. If we exclude candidates based on convictions groups that are over-represented in our criminal system will be systematically under represented by our political system.
@9GFVHJM1yr1Y
yes but the sentence must be done being served they must not be currently on parole and it cannot be commited while in office
@9G4FX2D2yrs2Y
No, and temporarily remove politicians that are under investigation for a crime until that investigation has been complete
@9G3LBVG2yrs2Y
Yes as long as they are done serving there sentence and they have proven that they are fit for government work.
Yes, as long as conviction is public knowledge.
@9FP3QX22yrs2Y
Yes, but only once they are found unlikely to offend again.
@9C9L9F52yrs2Y
Yes, so long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime, and there is evidence of change.
@95WYDFJNew Democratic3yrs3Y
Depends on the crime and how bad it was
@B3MY9V31mo1MO
if the business allows hiring of people with criminal records then its fine by me, me personally I would not change anything.
@B38Q5HR2mos2MO
Most people with a record can’t get a normal job. Why should we trust you in a position of power? NEXT
@B37NJMH2mos2MO
Yes as long as it was a small crimes such as petty theft 20+ years ago when they were dumb in their 20s
@B36JNQYConservative2mos2MO
Depends on the crime and if the conviction was well justified and not targeted because they are a politician
@B32JFRV2mos2MO
I think it really depends on the situation if it was a crime committed maybe when they were young then I think it shouldn't affect them, but it it was a crime that is extreme then no they should not be allowed to run.
@B2ZJH9G2mos2MO
yes they should be allowed to run as long as the crime wasnt pedophillia, sex trafficing, multiple mansaughters / murder victims
@B2W3NVZ2mos2MO
No, voting should be abolished, and appointment decisions ought to be made on a case-by-case basis according to the proper authorities.
@B2R667BConservative2mos2MO
Yes, as long as it was not a violent or sexual crime. They should also have to have finished serving their sentence.
@B29T5JY3mos3MO
Yes, as long as they pass a psychological examination, and have been determined unlikely to offend again.
@B25947C4mos4MO
as long as said crime was committed and made-up for at minimum 10 years before they even ran for office
@B22PYZ74mos4MO
If it is something minor like shoplifting when they were thirteen that is fine. Anything else is not
@9XCL7LD6mos6MO
Yes, as long as they have finished their sentence, and their surface could benefit our future society. Minor offences shouldn't be of much concern, especially if the candidate is the most qualified person for the job.
Depends on the sevarity of the crime and their record. Also, it matters if the crime was committed in office.
yes, unless they have committed a first-class felony, are still serving time, or the crime happened withing the last 10 years and was a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
@9V685J37mos7MO
Yes unless the crime was within the profession or the crime which would be bad was something they want to defend
@9TWK4RLConservative7mos7MO
I think it depends on the severity of the crime. For more serious indictable offences (assault with a weapon) I don't think they should be.
@9TQFC7D7mos7MO
Dependent on the crime however even if they are able to run regardless, it can affect the way people vote so it may not be a smart move to allow
@9TQ5P3T7mos7MO
Yes, but only if they pass psychological safety, general knowledge, and competency testing to ensure that they are fit to represent the country
@9T9X43P7mos7MO
Yes as long as they are finished serving BUT I do think it depends on what the crime is. If it's ex. murder or rape then NO WAY should you be allowed to run for office.
@9T878LK7mos7MO
It depends on how severe the crime was as well as if there is standing proof that they have changed. Then yes.
@9T7VDX57mos7MO
Depends on the crime if you had like a speeding ticket yes but if your committed a really bad crime no.
@9RPPNG79mos9MO
Yes, so long as he has paid his debt to society and his involvement in politics does not pose a conflict of interest of that his crimes were not related to his duties if elected.
@9RJ6K3V9mos9MO
Yes, but only so long as their criminal history does not pose a conflict of interest with their position.
@9QSGHLG9mos9MO
No, only if the crime was not major (felony, violent, financial, sexual), and they have already faced charges.
@9QQVM6K9mos9MO
I believe whether a politician convicted of a crime should run for office depends on the severity and context of the offence. Serious crimes like murder or assault can reflect poor judgement and should disqulify them, while minor offences like petty theft should not.
@9QQJ6PS10mos10MO
Honestly, it depends on the type of crime. Such as, 1st degree murder vs 3rd degree. (1st degree means it is completely planned and this person should not be running for office. 3rd degree is a bit more accidental, so they could be running for office, however, it will be difficult for them.)
@9QQF5BG10mos10MO
There should be a system in allowing politicians to run for office depending on the severity and public opinion on their criminal record.
@9Q2Y5ZM10mos10MO
Yes, so long as their criminal history does not pose a conflict of interest with holding a political office.
@9MLGJ6Y11mos11MO
As long as it was not a violent felony, financial or sexual crime -and- disallow politicians that are under investigation for felonies.
depends on the background of the politician. as some clean collared can be framed in crimes. if not with clean background, free of corruption then such kind of a person should not be allowed.
@9MBPXTR11mos11MO
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence, and can prove they are capable of moving forward and will not repeat same mistakes. They should also be monitored.
@9LKHLWL1yr1Y
The trump administration has been placed under pressure after pointing out rigged elections, and left-wing ideology. Trump will likely win the 2024 elections, despite his criminal record.
@9LK2YSN1yr1Y
depends on the crime and motives behind it and if they have served time as well as changed as a person
@9LJVNVS1yr1Y
Depends on the severity of the crime. If they were caught speeding and got a speeding ticket at a young age, I would say "no". Some people learn as they grow.
@9KZNG6Q1yr1Y
Yes, because there are different situations in life, and a person could be framed, or he could understand his mistakes and change, but if he repeated it twice, then no
@9HPQSXB1yr1Y
Depends on the severity of the crime, if it was a first time offence and how long ago the crime was committed
@9FKLRPD2yrs2Y
Yes, as long as they’ve recovered and shown that they are ready to rum for office
@9FBD8RW2yrs2Y
yes as long as it was not a sirious crime like violence, taxes, finnancial, sexual and any other that may mean lawsdissapearing.
@9F9LLVX2yrs2Y
depends on the crime convicted.
@9F8Y2RL2yrs2Y
Yes, as long as they show remorse for what they have done, and it is not dangerous or harmful to anyone
@9F323L52yrs2Y
depends on the crime, severity, and circumstances of it
depending on the situation, if its a wrongly convicted person or a small crime and they are trying to move on or improve sure. but if they have commited the worst of the worst and were rightfully convicted no.
@9DP7FDM2yrs2Y
Normally no, but it depends on the crime they did and the severity of it.
@9DMFBBZ2yrs2Y
Depending what the crime is
@B29DRJC3mos3MO
Yes, as long as they have served their time, the crime is not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual. and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
@9TFK7JC7mos7MO
I think it depends on the severity of the crime how long ago it was and if they prove themselves worthy.
depending on how bad the charge is and what is was for, for example if it was impaired driving or jaywalking i believe it would be okay. but if it were to be armed robbery or murder, i do not believe that person should have the right.
@9QZCYDN9mos9MO
If their sentence is over, and it wasn't a serious crime, and it wasn't recently, then yes. Otherwise no
As long as its not a felony ,financial or sexual crime and they have been finished serving thier sentence and are pleaded not guilty however I believe they should be able to run for office for a minimum of 2 years after the crime
@9LRJT4FNew Democratic12mos12MO
Seems like a case by case basis here, if someone stole something then fine but if they were violent then no
@8ZFWBD33yrs3Y
depends on the severity of the crime.
@B2L5VZSConservative3mos3MO
Yes, but it depends on the crime. Sexual, Violent, or National Security crime should be the exception.
@9SR7BTC8mos8MO
i think that if they comitted a victimless crime they can run, but if they did crimes that harmed other people they should not run for office.
@9F477VS2yrs2Y
Only if there is proof that the incident was more of an accident and not on the person's part.
@9CYBX6J2yrs2Y
Yes, as long as they can prove they've changed and the crime is not violence, financial, or sexual.
@9CM7H5T2yrs2Y
it depends on how extreme the crime was, and if it was committed while in office
@9BZ4KPF2yrs2Y
Yeah, Unless they are under suspicion of re-offending
@9BMSVMV2yrs2Y
Depends on what they were convicted for
@9BKGN7H2yrs2Y
if they have showed proper change then yes
@9B224XW2yrs2Y
Yes as long as everyone knows what the crime was and they have finished their sentence
@99ZDG722yrs2Y
depends on the crime committed because some individuals are falsely accused.
@99XRF242yrs2Y
depends on the crime, if it is jail time crime than no
@99JRF9C2yrs2Y
What's office? Is that like working as an office worker or something?
@96SK3M82yrs2Y
depends of how serious the crime is
@96GFPZDNew Democratic3yrs3Y
depending on the crime and whether or not the person has atoned for it
@96GBXWQ3yrs3Y
sure. depends on what happens
@96FKHN83yrs3Y
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence ,and make sure they don't do it again.
@96DGQW53yrs3Y
If they committed a serious crime
@96D85B23yrs3Y
yes but they have to make it known of the crime
Yes, as long as it is in the past, was not a feloney, violent, sexual or financal crime, and as long as it was not commited in office.
@962GV76Conservative3yrs3Y
It depends how severe the crime was.
@96277V93yrs3Y
Depends how sever the crime is and when it took place (time wise)
@95YCXKH3yrs3Y
Yes, (depends on sentence) as long as they have finished their sentence, gone through physical and mental therapy regarding their sentence…
@95SHLG43yrs3Y
regulate them, bar practice that is a danger to the public.
@95QQ3VR3yrs3Y
It depeneds on the crime
@95QPXFX3yrs3Y
No if it was a serious crime
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
