+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 169 Conservatism voters.

30%
Yes
70%
No
30%
Yes
70%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 169 Conservatism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 169 Conservatism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Conservatism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B46V7MRfrom Alberta  answered…4wks4W

No, and land acknowledgments pose a significant legal challenge to laws regarding unreasonable search and seizure. If we structure our society as if we were occupying stolen land, or in possession of stolen property, we would forfeit any legal rights to due process. These acts of Neo-Marxist legalistic colonialism must be put down brutally and quickly.

 @B4GWPTLfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

Land Acknowledgements are a liberal farce and we should focus on actually returning sovereignty to Indigenous peoples

 @B4SSTX3from Alberta  answered…2 days2D

Are they providing proceeds to Indigenous groups or just tokenizing them with a land acknowledgement

 @9V7ZQ9Sfrom Maine  answered…7mos7MO

 @9TXLQ28from Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

Acknowledgement is condescending. Do something material or stop the acknowledgments.

 @B38PWRMfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but only if they commit to ongoing truth and reconciliation practices within their organization/company

 @B37N6CPfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

If the land acknowledge is meaningful and not the monotone version we all get now, I feel like it’s a bandaid and we should be more action towards reconciliation

 @B35WYBCfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but I recognize that land Acknowledgements are only a first step in a reconciliation process, and we must move beyond them as well