+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 194 Right voters.

28%
Yes
72%
No
28%
Yes
72%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 194 Right voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 194 Right voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Right voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZMGHLR from Ontario  answered…4 days4D

Feels like an empty statement. What are words without actions, acknowledging you are on indigenous land while harming indigenous people means nothing

 @9ZLYGN7from Newfoundland  answered…5 days5D

Yes, and the land acknowledgements should be written and/or approved by the Indigenous community it is acknowledging.

 @9YMS6L8from Ontario  answered…2wks2W

 @9YK7T9Bfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

The government should focus less on symbolic acts of support for Indigenous people and more on materially improving their lives and making sure they can all do basic things like drink clean water and afford food.

 @9XQCRFD  from Pennsylvania  answered…3wks3W

No, it's primarily lip-service that's reductive of the broader history of the land and its people.

 @9XNDVW9from Ontario  answered…3wks3W

Yes, but only if the event is associated with action retributive and restorative action

 @9X3ZQ9Sfrom Ontario  answered…3wks3W

these do nothing and do not help indigenous people it is just so we feel better

 @9W555VDfrom British Columbia  answered…1mo1MO

No because what are they doing to fix the problem. We all know it's stolen land