Proponents argue that it would preserve cultural heritage and appeal to those who value traditional designs. Opponents argue that it would stifle innovation and limit the design freedom of car manufacturers.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Response rates from 669 Canada voters.
13% Yes |
87% No |
13% Yes |
87% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 669 Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 669 Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZXWXP23wks3W
No, because car aesthetics does not involve serious issues other than issues that's need more focus
@9WYDMSD2mos2MO
no but we can give tax credits and incentives if car manufacturers did that.
@9VCP7623mos3MO
We should be able to design different cars, the past is in the past, if you'd like a vintage car then buy one, but that doesn't mean all cars have to be to your liking and style, everyone has different opinions and differences.
@9SLJBJV4mos4MO
No, but things like headlights, brake lights need to remain standardized.
@9RZPX675mos5MO
no it is up to private vehicle companies and the market to decide what to buy. take the tesla cybertruck, the market is currently deciding if the truck is worth the durability or not worth the cost due to aesthetics.
@9RQNPMR5mos5MO
They should require function over form. Of the shelf parts bolt on bolt off modules. Fully recyclable.
@9P8NRFM 6mos6MO
As long as the aesthetics of a vehicle does not hinder or conflict with the standards of protocols set in place to ensure the safety of the driver, its occupants, and other outside individuals within the presence of the automobile.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
