Proponents argue that it would preserve cultural heritage and appeal to those who value traditional designs. Opponents argue that it would stifle innovation and limit the design freedom of car manufacturers.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Province/Territory
Response rates from 1.5k Canada voters.
14% Yes |
86% No |
14% Yes |
86% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.5k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.5k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B3PTXTY1mo1MO
I love old cars, many vehicles look the same now, trucks, suvs, most cars and there’s no flare to the vehicles anymore unless they’re super expensive. I want cars that make me whistle as they drive past
@B3G5TN42mos2MO
No, so long as the design doesn't pose a danger or inhibit driver visibility
@B3CPZL72mos2MO
Should the UK labour party leader and prime minister how automobile service is checked lists and anwser right questions by the books issues designs classics issues by french president revolution in based new jobs is available
@B39JDXJ2mos2MO
This should be up to the individual not the government.
@B2ZJH9G2mos2MO
no everybody deserves to own whatever car they want but something should be done to all cars to lower carbon emmisions
@B2Y4YCB2mos2MO
Classic aesthetics should be mandated as at least one per current inventory however modern cars should still be developed.
@B2XJCNN2mos2MO
Should be worring about quity and saftey not nessisarily estetics
@B2TWT9H2mos2MO
Not too technology. For example, not having autopilot in cars.
Join in on the most popular conversations.