Proponents argue that it would preserve cultural heritage and appeal to those who value traditional designs. Opponents argue that it would stifle innovation and limit the design freedom of car manufacturers.
Response rates from 150 British Columbia voters.
13% Yes |
87% No |
13% Yes |
87% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 150 British Columbia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 150 British Columbia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from British Columbia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9WYDMSD3wks3W
no but we can give tax credits and incentives if car manufacturers did that.
@9VCP7622mos2MO
We should be able to design different cars, the past is in the past, if you'd like a vintage car then buy one, but that doesn't mean all cars have to be to your liking and style, everyone has different opinions and differences.
@9SLJBJV3mos3MO
No, but things like headlights, brake lights need to remain standardized.
@9RZPX673mos3MO
no it is up to private vehicle companies and the market to decide what to buy. take the tesla cybertruck, the market is currently deciding if the truck is worth the durability or not worth the cost due to aesthetics.
@9RQNPMR4mos4MO
They should require function over form. Of the shelf parts bolt on bolt off modules. Fully recyclable.
@9P8NRFM 5mos5MO
As long as the aesthetics of a vehicle does not hinder or conflict with the standards of protocols set in place to ensure the safety of the driver, its occupants, and other outside individuals within the presence of the automobile.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
