Diesel emissions standards regulate the amount of pollutants that diesel engines can emit to reduce air pollution. Proponents argue that stricter standards improve air quality and public health by reducing harmful emissions. Opponents argue that it increases costs for manufacturers and consumers and could reduce the availability of diesel vehicles.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Province/Territory
Response rates from 334 Independents voters.
58% Yes |
42% No |
58% Yes |
42% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 334 Independents voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 334 Independents voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Independents voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B23B8DT2wks2W
climate change is a joke and implementing more harsher policies will only be more costly for not only citizens but these policies are expensive to put into place
@9ZMRC281mo1MO
Government should work towards making infastrucutre to support a smooth transition to electric cars for citizens
@9ZH2FNQ1mo1MO
diesel vehicles are the best they shouldnt have stricter standards
@9ZG8R7Q1mo1MO
Essential equipment and services like farming and heavy transportation should be exempt. Personal diesels should have Stricker standards.
@9ZF4M8J1mo1MO
Whatever they choose to do should not impact the working class any more than industry
@9TP4MHS3mos3MO
Yes, but should also start reducing diesel vehicals in general
@9WQ4K262mos2MO
Yes, as long it doesn't negitively impact the consumer
@9VY5FM62mos2MO
No. The emissions parts on pickup trucks are rushed technology and the parts are STILL breaking down 12 years later at enormous cost to consumers. Reduce the standards until reliable tech is developed.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
