Geoengineering refers to the deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth's climate system to counteract climate change, such as by reflecting sunlight, increasing precipitation, or removing CO2 from the atmosphere. Proponents argue that geoengineering could provide innovative solutions to global warming. Opponents argue that it is risky, unproven, and could have unforeseen negative consequences.
Response rates from 590 Canada voters.
76% Yes |
24% No |
76% Yes |
24% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 590 Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 590 Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9VGMJSQ2wks2W
I believe the should find ways to fight against climate change but not spend to much doing it
@9TYFLTG4wks4W
No, and we should campaign against harmful geo-engineering globally.
@9TRYYND4wks4W
Yes, but ensure judgement throughout as to whether that level of environmental meddling & manipulation will have any unaccounted for consequences
@9TFQXBL1mo1MO
No, simply, known solutions to climate change should be utilized instead if spending time and money on new research that may or may not get used.
@9TFCZYH1mo1MO
Only fund research into geoengineering as a last ditch effort to combat climate change.
@9FGSKLL 5mos5MO
No, instead, invest aggressively into sustainable renewable resources like solar, wind, and geothermal
@9MW9BY2 5mos5MO
YES, but only if research is not harming the environment.
@9ML75L25mos5MO
Yes but in a way that will not allow lenience in companies to increase their carbon footprint.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
