Geoengineering refers to the deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth's climate system to counteract climate change, such as by reflecting sunlight, increasing precipitation, or removing CO2 from the atmosphere. Proponents argue that geoengineering could provide innovative solutions to global warming. Opponents argue that it is risky, unproven, and could have unforeseen negative consequences.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Province/Territory
Response rates from 185 Conservative voters.
57% Yes |
43% No |
57% Yes |
43% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 185 Conservative voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 185 Conservative voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Conservative voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B4QQ4PH6 days6D
Climate change has been proven a hoax by many accredited scientists around the world yet our government thinks it's the end all of everything
@B2BMK7B3mos3MO
Yes, but only with a gradual implementation, & that it is constantly tested & improved upon.
@B29K7YN 4mos4MO
Yes depending on the budget and if the main needs of the country are met first then we can focus on a need that can change the whole world.
@B29HFDL4mos4MO
No, as geoengineering has not yet been proven to address the root causes of climate change
@B228W6V5mos5MO
No, but incentivize private companies willing to do it instead
@9ZZFCJJ5mos5MO
if you could control the weather for a day, what changes would you make and why?
@9ZNXRCY5mos5MO
Yes but since climate change is a global issue, they should take it up with the UN
@9TFQXBL7mos7MO
No, simply, known solutions to climate change should be utilized instead if spending time and money on new research that may or may not get used.
Join in on the most popular conversations.