Answer Overview

Response rates from 571 Canada voters.

70%
Yes
30%
No
66%
Yes
30%
No
4%
Yes, and also increase spending for renewable energy and reforestation
0%
No, provide subsidies to renewable energy companies instead
0%
No, tax carbon emissions instead
0%
No, the government should invest in planting more trees to capture carbon instead

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 571 Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 571 Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9TYSP55from Ontario answered…4wks4W

Carbon capture is bolony they have been using this tech to get more oil from the ground for years, tax carbon emissions but have a policy in place so the company cannot pass the cost of carbon emission cost onto average people.

 @9TLF4ZNfrom New Brunswick answered…1mo1MO

If it’s your mess clean it up, same goes here they can afford it if they cause the harm they pay the price. It’s pretty common sense no?

 @9SLJBJVfrom British Columbia answered…2mos2MO

 @9RTLWCPfrom Ontario answered…3mos3MO

 @9RC2NJVfrom Manitoba answered…3mos3MO

No. All companies should be using CC by a set date, and should he penalized after this date if they are not.

 @9RC2QHKfrom Nova Scotia answered…3mos3MO

No, and charge/tax companies that previously accepted subsidies after being investigated on the autheticity of their stats.

 @9RBVFQQfrom Prince Edward Island answered…3mos3MO

No, it is better to focus on not emitting the carbon in the first place. Invest in that.

 @9QZCYDNfrom Ontario answered…3mos3MO

Either really small ones or not at all. The focus should be on replacing fossil fuels.