+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 371 Left voters.

79%
Yes
21%
No
75%
Yes
17%
No
4%
Yes, and also increase spending for renewable energy and reforestation
2%
No, the government should invest in planting more trees to capture carbon instead
1%
No, provide subsidies to renewable energy companies instead
1%
No, tax carbon emissions instead

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 371 Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 371 Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9TYSP55from Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Carbon capture is bolony they have been using this tech to get more oil from the ground for years, tax carbon emissions but have a policy in place so the company cannot pass the cost of carbon emission cost onto average people.

 @9TLF4ZNfrom New Brunswick  answered…2mos2MO

If it’s your mess clean it up, same goes here they can afford it if they cause the harm they pay the price. It’s pretty common sense no?

 @9SLJBJVfrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

 @9RTLWCPfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

 @9RC2NJVfrom Manitoba  answered…4mos4MO

No. All companies should be using CC by a set date, and should he penalized after this date if they are not.

 @9RC2QHKfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4mos4MO

No, and charge/tax companies that previously accepted subsidies after being investigated on the autheticity of their stats.

 @9RBVFQQfrom Prince Edward Island  answered…4mos4MO

No, it is better to focus on not emitting the carbon in the first place. Invest in that.

 @9QZCYDNfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

Either really small ones or not at all. The focus should be on replacing fossil fuels.